On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:42 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it just me, or are Milan's posts upside-down for everyone?
> >
> > It's not just you. At first I though
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Is it just me, or are Milan's posts upside-down for everyone?
>
> It's not just you. At first I thought he was doing it as a sly way of
> telling people not to top-post, but now
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:48 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > Is it just me, or are Milan's posts upside-down for everyone?
>
> Please file a bug report with version information:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Evolution
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 10:28 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > Milan
> > Bye,
> > anyway, it'll remove the local information about it only.
> > delete the foreign calendar, you might not have privileges for it
> > That's the inten
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Is it just me, or are Milan's posts upside-down for everyone?
Please file a bug report with version information:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Evolution
No problem in 3.20.5 on Fedora 24 (likely a WK2 issue in 3.22?).
andr
Am 27.09.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Milan Crha:
Milan
Bye,
anyway, it'll remove the local information about it only.
delete the foreign calendar, you might not have privileges for it
That's the intended way of removing other user's calendar. It will not
Open the Calendar view, right-click the c
On 27/09/16 10:56, Hans Vandewalle wrote:
They are upside-down for me also.
On di, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 10:28 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
Milan Bye, anyway, it'll remove the local information about it only.
delete the foreign calendar, you might not h
They are upside-down for me also.
On di, 2016-09-27 at 09:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 10:28 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
Milan
Bye,
anyway, it'll remove the local information about it only.
delete the foreign calendar, you might not have privileges for it
That's the intended w
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 10:28 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Milan
> Bye,
> anyway, it'll remove the local information about it only.
> delete the foreign calendar, you might not have privileges for it
> That's the intended way of removing other user's calendar. It will not
> Open the Calendar view,
Milan
Bye,
anyway, it'll remove the local information about it only.
delete the foreign calendar, you might not have privileges for it
That's the intended way of removing other user's calendar. It will not
Open the Calendar view, right-click the calendar and choose Delete.
> some configurat
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 20:51 -0800, Louis Ezra wrote:
> Is there a way to view the logon information being passed to the MS
> Exchange server by Evolution?
Hi,
for evolution-exchange you can use E2K_DEBUG=5, either on evolution
itself (since 2.30.0, if I recall correctly), or on
evolution-
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 13:29 -0700, Capehart, William J wrote:
> I've just started experimenting with the Exchange 2008 mapi w/
> Evolution and while the setup was a breeze, I have two problems with
> the Calendar component.
>
> 1) my recurring appointments do not show up.
>
> 2) More importantl
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 14:33 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:29 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > This *should* be attempting to build from git head.
> >
> > anyone else seeing this build failure?
> > suggestions?
>
> Part of the eds-dbus branch landed today. The address boo
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 14:33 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:29 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > This *should* be attempting to build from git head.
> >
> > anyone else seeing this build failure?
> > suggestions?
>
> Part of the eds-dbus branch landed today. The address boo
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:29 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> This *should* be attempting to build from git head.
>
> anyone else seeing this build failure?
> suggestions?
>
>
>
> ccache gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../evolution-exchange/storage -I..
> -I../../../evolution-exchange -I../../../
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:29 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> This *should* be attempting to build from git head.
>
> anyone else seeing this build failure?
> suggestions?
Part of the eds-dbus branch landed today. The address book side of
Evolution-Data-Server no longer uses Bonobo. Evolution-Excha
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 17:42, Art Alexion wrote:
> Our server is 2003. Do the two connectors function in such a way that I can
> try the MAPI connector, but switch back to OWA when needed, i.e., are they
> activated and deactivated like plug ins?
You don't even have to switch back and forth. Y
.
--
Art Alexion
MIS/Central Office Support
Resources for Human Development
- Original Message -
From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Sent: Tue Apr 28 07:34:55 2009
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution-Exchange on Ubuntu Jaunty
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 19:03, Art
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 19:03, Art Alexion wrote:
> I'd like to upgrade my production machine, but am concerned about either
> the stability and functionality of the mapi connector, or the continued
> availability of the OWA-based connector. I really can't afford for this
> to be an experimental
If this is happening occasionally, then it is a known bug. I usually resolve it
by running the command
evolution --force-shutdown
and forcing a refresh of the inbox a few times until all of the messages are
showing. The bug doesn't seem to affect folders other than the inbox.
The developers o
From: Suman Manjunath [manjunath.su...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 9:57 PM
To: Dustin Hamilton
Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution + Exchange (was: Evolution for Windows...)
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 21:37, Dustin Hamilton wrote:
>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 21:37, Dustin Hamilton wrote:
> I assume that WIP means Work In Progress?
Yes :-)
> Also, did you mean that some packages are more difficult to find on xUbuntu?
Nothing like that. evolution-mapi depends on Evolution 2.25.3 which
will only be available with GNOME 2.26 (i.
y 18, 2009 8:33 AM
To: Dustin Hamilton
Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution + Exchange (was: Evolution for Windows...)
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 19:27, Dustin Hamilton wrote:
> I found a command to get the evolution-exchange package installed, but it
> kicks an e
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 19:27, Dustin Hamilton wrote:
> I found a command to get the evolution-exchange package installed, but it
> kicks an error... seems to detect my Exchange 2007 server as being Exchange
> 5.5 and states the Exchange Connector only supports 2000 and 2003. Any
> suggestions?
Here is the Debug
(evolution:17513): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with
non-zero page size is deprecated
(evolution:17513): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with
non-zero page size is deprecated
e-data-server-ui-Messa
Please see the attached Debug.
(evolution:17513): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with
non-zero page size is deprecated
(evolution:17513): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with
non-zero page size is deprecated
e-data-server-ui-Message: Unable to find passw
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:41 -0800, Ravi Shah wrote:
> I believe it is using Exchange 2003, but here is the URL that it is
> re-directing to.
>
> https://Corp.URL/CookieAuth.dll?GetLogon?reason=0&formdir=1&curl=Z2FOWAZ2F
>
> and it has typical Microsoft Outlook Web Access Form. If I enable not to
I believe it is using Exchange 2003, but here is the URL that it is
re-directing to.
https://Corp.URL/CookieAuth.dll?GetLogon?reason=0&formdir=1&curl=Z2FOWAZ2F
and it has typical Microsoft Outlook Web Access Form. If I enable not to
accept cookies, site won't let me login and asking to enable t
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 08:33 -0800, Ravi Shah wrote:
> I am new to Linux Desktop running Fedora 10 back to 9, and now back to 10,
> but can't get the Evolution Exchange work with the Corporate. I have
> shifted through hundreds of documents, and few things I have found that
> there appears to be is
> Steinar Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Art Alexion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> I don't much care, except that I have to change my habits when moving
>>> from one list to another.
>> My sentiments exactly.
> FWIW I use NNTP a
> "Art Alexion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> I don't much care, except that I have to change my habits when moving
>> from one list to another.
> My sentiments exactly.
FWIW I use NNTP access to http://gmane.org for most of the mail
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 17:51 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> sorry for only reverting now.
>
> I have tried the send receive. It took a good half hour to finish and
> did not solve the problem.
That's not good. Does it do this only the first time, or every time you
press Send/Receive? The first
sorry for only reverting now.
I have tried the send receive. It took a good half hour to finish and
did not solve the problem.
Does evolution not just sync in the background and keep up to date?
It does eventually come right but I can't see why?
--- Begin Message ---
Send/Receive --- End Messag
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 12:41 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 17:02 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> > When I sent out the original email, the messages that had been deleted
> > at work all still appeared in evolution.
> >
> > Much later (longer than an hour) the folder just magically
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 11:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:33 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 10:31 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > > In 2.12 left clicking on an address opens up a new message, not a
> > > reply
> > > > to the one you
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:33 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 10:31 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > > In 2.12 left clicking on an address opens up a new message, not a
> > reply
> > > to the one you were reading. Don't know if it's different in 2.22.
> >
> > It's not di
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:02 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 20:32 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I just checked and the MA Ubuntu user's group list also doesn't set
> > reply-to
> If you are referring to a Massachusetts Loco group list, I can tell
> you the the Pennsylvania and New
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 11:02 -0400, Nigel Atherton wrote:
>
> Just came back online and noticed lots of emails about my
> transgression.
> Oops, bit of a noobie and didn't know the protocol.
>
> When I sent out the original email, the messages that had been deleted
> at work all still appeared in
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 10:31 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > In 2.12 left clicking on an address opens up a new message, not a
> reply
> > to the one you were reading. Don't know if it's different in 2.22.
>
> It's not different. Clicking opens a compose window for a new message.
Uh... y
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 08:16 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> > * can I reply to one of the recipients by right clicking on
> the
> > corresponding address field? (No, in this case I must "reply
> > all" then remove the other addressees, which is sometimes no
> so
> > easy
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 00:55 -0400, Alpár Jüttner wrote:
> can I reply to one of the recipients by right clicking on the
> corresponding address field? (No, in this case I must "reply
> all" then remove the other addressees, which is sometimes no
> so
> easy.)
This is a kmai
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 20:32 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I just checked and the MA Ubuntu user's group list also doesn't set
> reply-to
What is the "MA Ubuntu user's group"? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
certainly defaults to reply-to-list.
If you are referring to a Massachusetts Loco group list, I can tell y
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 17:02 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> When I sent out the original email, the messages that had been deleted
> at work all still appeared in evolution.
>
> Much later (longer than an hour) the folder just magically seemed to
> update and remove the files that had been deleted.
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 14:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> In 2.12 left clicking on an address opens up a new message, not a
> reply to the one you were reading. Don't know if it's different in
> 2.22.
Oh right. D'oh! Shouldn't post when I'm thinking about my soccer
(err... football for many of you
Just came back online and noticed lots of emails about my transgression.
Oops, bit of a noobie and didn't know the protocol.
When I sent out the original email, the messages that had been deleted
at work all still appeared in evolution.
Much later (longer than an hour) the folder just magically s
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 14:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > * can I "reply all"? (Yes, of course)
> > > * can I reply to one of the recipients by right clicking on the
> > > corresponding address field? (No, in this case I must "reply
> > > all" then remove the other addr
> > * can I "reply all"? (Yes, of course)
> > * can I reply to one of the recipients by right clicking on the
> > corresponding address field? (No, in this case I must "reply
> > all" then remove the other addressees, which is sometimes no so
> > easy.)
>
> I'm
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 05:55 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote:
> > > And then follow it up with "reply to considered useful":
> > > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
> >
> > But you cannot forget the coupe de grace, "'Reply-To' Munging Still
> > Considered Harmful. Really."
> > http://wo
> > And then follow it up with "reply to considered useful":
> > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
>
> But you cannot forget the coupe de grace, "'Reply-To' Munging Still
> Considered Harmful. Really."
> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
This third essay
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 18:18 -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> > Nope, it's a PITA to you and some others, but it's absolutely the
> > preferred behavior for me and some others on this list. And, probably,
> > there are some who don't care one way or the other :-).
> >
> > FYI: http://www.unicom.com/pw
> Nope, it's a PITA to you and some others, but it's absolutely the
> preferred behavior for me and some others on this list. And, probably,
> there are some who don't care one way or the other :-).
>
> FYI: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
And then follow it up with "reply to cons
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I don't much care, except that I have to change my habits when moving
> from one list to another.
My sentiments exactly.
--
Art Alexion
MIS
x3075
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I'm on various Ubuntu lists like ubuntu-devel-discuss and they don't
> use
> reply-to.
maybe not the devel lists, but certainly ubuntu-users and kubuntu-users,
default to reply-to-list, as do kdepim-user, tellico-user,
kmymoney-user, amarok, u
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:29 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> First, this comes up every so often so it's worth it to look for
> previous threads. Second, your assertion that "most other email lists
> of this type" use reply-to-list is not correct; in fact as far as I
> recall I don't belong to a single
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:18 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Reply-to-all and reply-to-list are not the same. Usually it doesn't
> matter, but as a rule I prefer to reply only on the list (and not via
> a cc) unless someone explicitly requests otherwise.
I know they're not the same but most mai
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:36 -0700, MHR wrote:
> Interesting - I don't actually belong to too many email discussion
> lists, all them are technical, like this one, and all the others
> (CentOS, GNOME, rpmforge, OOo) use the reply-to-all as the default.
I belong to a LOT of GNU lists and none of the
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:30 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I just use Ctrl-L (Message->Reply to List).
>
> I just use "Reply to All".
Reply-to-all and reply-to-list are not the same. Usually it doesn't
matter, but as a rule I prefer to
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:29 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > It would be REALLY nice if the list defaulted to sending replies to
> > everyone on the list instead of the article sender, like most other
> > email lists of this type.
>
> First, this comes u
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First, this comes up every so often so it's worth it to look for
> previous threads. Second, your assertion that "most other email lists
> of this type" use reply-to-list is not correct; in fact as far as I
> recall I don'
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I just use Ctrl-L (Message->Reply to List).
I just use "Reply to All".
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
>>
>> It would be REALLY nice if the list defaulted to sending replies to
>> everyone on the list instead of the article sender, like most other
>> email lists of this ty
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> It would be REALLY nice if the list defaulted to sending replies to
> everyone on the list instead of the article sender, like most other
> email lists of this type.
First, this comes up every so often so it's worth it to look for
previous threads.
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Please always CC the mailing list rather than replying privately... if
> > you reply just to me then you won't get any answer until I have time.
> > If you reply to the li
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please always CC the mailing list rather than replying privately... if
> you reply just to me then you won't get any answer until I have time.
> If you reply to the list, anyone who knows the answer can help.
It would be R
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:43 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> Evolution version 2.22.3.1
>
> Ubuntu is fully patched and on hardy.
>
> The system has been working for about two months now. I haven't tried
> send and receive and after a while (about an hour) the email did seem
> to sync eventually.
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:23 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> So I purchased a laptop, put Ubuntu on it and loaded Evolution with
> the exchange connection.
>
> Problem is, the emails downloaded to evolution don't keep in sync with
> the exchange server. I spent today deleting and tidying up emails
> "Alastair Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW I have my password stored and meeting notifications don't come up.
> On top of which, it's supposed to be (and appears to be) integrated
> into the gnome calendar. I don't get notifications for local meetings
> either.
The gnome calendar is the
> Chenthill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You need to have your password remembered for meeting notifications to
> come up.
It is, as far as I know. At least I'm not prompted when reading email,
when sending email, and when modifying the Exchange calendar.
> IIRC srini enabled some logs from alarm
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 20:19 +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
> > Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Unfortunately you don't say exactly what "so bad" means. For the
> > first week or so of Hardy, Evo was unusable; no question. After that
> > some updates were made that greatly stabilized the pr
> Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Unfortunately you don't say exactly what "so bad" means. For the
> first week or so of Hardy, Evo was unusable; no question. After that
> some updates were made that greatly stabilized the program.
What made me eventually stop using Evolution, and evoluti
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 10:32 -0400, Barry D. Hassler wrote:
> I've given this almost a month to see if there would be any updates,
> but it's so bad, I've actually regressed several years, and am now
> depending on Outlook running on my (virtual) Windows XP system. I'm
> going to try building from s
On 23/05/2008, at 16.32, Barry D. Hassler wrote:
I've given this almost a month to see if there would be any updates,
but it's so bad, I've actually regressed several years, and am now
depending on Outlook running on my (virtual) Windows XP system. I'm
going to try building from source, bu
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: evolution-list@gnome.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 23. Mai 2008, 21:32:23 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy
I've given this almost a month to see if there would be any updates, but it's
so bad, I've actually re
I've given this almost a month to see if there would be any updates, but
it's so bad, I've actually regressed several years, and am now depending on
Outlook running on my (virtual) Windows XP system. I'm going to try building
from source, but previous attempts at that were unsuccessful (or more
rea
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 22:01 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Pardon my unfamiliarity with Ubuntu, but what exactly were the
> Evolution versions that you found to be stable on 32-bit and unstable
> on 64-bit?
I've been running the latest SVN head versions on Ubuntu 7.04 and 7.10
since about last Aug
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:14 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I don't know if it's 64bit machines (are others with 64bit systems
> having issues with Evolution?), the particular build that Ubuntu is
> doing of Evolution, or what in the heck is going on but this is far
> and away the least stable, most unu
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:03 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > > > I don't really thing anyone cares about connecting to Exchange 2007. At
> > > > least, that's the way it appears to me.
> >
> > I running 2.12.3 and as long as I execute the exports, the MAPI plugin
> > loads and I can set up a MAPI
Rick, Joseph, and everyone :)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Rick Bilonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I running 2.12.3 and as long as I execute the exports, the MAPI plugin
> loads and I can set up a MAPI account. When I try to connect, I cannot
> get it to authenticate and I don't know wh
> > > I don't really thing anyone cares about connecting to Exchange 2007. At
> > > least, that's the way it appears to me.
>
> I running 2.12.3 and as long as I execute the exports, the MAPI plugin
> loads and I can set up a MAPI account. When I try to connect, I cannot
> get it to authenticat
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:54 +1000, Greg Vickers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Rick Bilonick wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 20:28 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >> After installing this in Fedora Core 8, I can not get the plug-in to
> >> activate. After I check it, it disables itself as soon as I rest
>Ubuntu 7.10 has
>Evolution version 2.12.1, I believe the MAPI plugin requires Evolution
>version 2.22, right?
I just installed 2.22 and that forced data-server to upgrade as well (Fedora
Core 8 dev repo) and now the plugin can't load as it says it needs
libcamel-1.2.so.10 which isn't provided b
Hi all,
Rick Bilonick wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 20:28 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> After installing this in Fedora Core 8, I can not get the plug-in to
>> activate. After I check it, it disables itself as soon as I restart
>> Evolution.
>>
>> Anyone seen this before?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> j
>Here is the well-kept secret (I could not find the original list
>messages I received):
>
>export PATH=/opt/samba4:$PATH
>export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/samba4/lib/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH
>export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/samba4/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
>This will have to be modified depending where your
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 20:28 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> After installing this in Fedora Core 8, I can not get the plug-in to
> activate. After I check it, it disables itself as soon as I restart Evolution.
>
> Anyone seen this before?
>
> Thanks!
> jlc
> ___
Does anyone know WHEN evolution will be able to access Exchange 2007 servers?
Why can't they FIX evolution so it works with Exchange 2007's OWA?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Evolution---Exchange-2007-tp14704503p14762841.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General ma
Paul,
I don't have a concrete answers for it. It is too early to say anything.
My most probable guess is that both should be supported. But it isn't
final.
-Srini.
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 08:20 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 21:39 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > > Once the MA
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 21:39 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > Once the MAPI-based solution is done, will it also be possible to use
> > the OWA-based solution? It's a big plus that you can do that today
> > because for direct access I need to setup a VPN to reach my Exchange but
> > I can reach t
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:00 +, Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO) wrote:
> What do you mean by e-b?
Hi Barbara; I'm sure Jules will give you more info, but I thought I'd
provide some background just to get your feet on solid ground.
Exchange supports two models of access: MAPI, which is a proprietar
-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution / Exchange 2007
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 08:56 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:00 +, Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO) wrote:
> > What do you mean by e-b?
>
> Hi Barbara; I'm sure Jules will give you more info,
Thomas,
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 09:43 +0100, Thomas Novin wrote:
> Hello
>
> Was looking for some info / roadmap for this but couldn't find anything
> on go-evolution.org (either on /Evo2.22 or /Evo_Future). Is there
> anything public avail?
Sources are at
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution-data
Regards,
Barbara Wood PMP
ITIO/ISSO - Infrastructure Specialty Services
-Original Message-
From: Jules Colding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:56 AM
To: Jacob Johnny
Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org; Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO)
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution
Srinivasa Ragavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:32 AM
To: Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO)
Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution / Exchange 2007
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 20:52 +, Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I
Hello
Was looking for some info / roadmap for this but couldn't find anything
on go-evolution.org (either on /Evo2.22 or /Evo_Future). Is there
anything public avail?
Will this be a MAPI based solution or will it use the web interface? I'm
actually not so interested in 2007, more interested in be
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 20:52 +, Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is it true that evolution version 2.14 will support Exchange 2007? If
> so, does anyone know the release date?
We call it Evolution 2.22 and not 2.14 (Versions are synced with GNOME).
There is a Exchange MA
Yes .. we are working on a new connector for Exchange 2007 connectivity. It
will not be part of Evolution 2.22 (2.14) as it needs some more work to be done.
Meanwhile there may be some incremental releases of this as a standalone plugin.
- Johnny
>>> "Wood, Barbara (ITIO-ISSO)" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Thomas..
On 07/11/2007, Thomas Sondag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just would like to know if there is a way to tell evolution to use the
> Notes stored on our exchange server (memo in evolution terminology) ?
to be frank, 'Notes' in Exchange does not conveniently corres
--- Thomas Sondag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just would like to know if there is a way to tell evolution to use the
> Notes stored on our exchange server (memo in evolution terminology) ?
>
> Using the exchange-connector-setup-2.12, I already manage to setup my mail
> / cale
Hi Jim,
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 18:07 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 19:36 +0200, Robin Meijboom wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:05 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote:
> > > Just upgraded my opensuse laptop to 10.3, which pulled Evo to 2.12. I
> > > like it, but my exchange account no lon
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:05 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote:
> I have tried the user name alone and with the windows domain in this
> format:
>
> domain\username
Try just the user name without the domain. I have been using 2.12 with
kubuntu gutsy for over a month now without exchange problems. In fact
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 19:36 +0200, Robin Meijboom wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:05 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote:
> > Just upgraded my opensuse laptop to 10.3, which pulled Evo to 2.12. I
> > like it, but my exchange account no longer works. At first, everything
> > appeared to be empty in the acc
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
