On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 09:02 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 10:44 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> > Just timed opening a new message at over 2 minutes. The folder had
> > been opened before. It's quite a big folder - 1600 messages - but the
> > message itself is only 6k.
>
> Hm. I
> Wow, that seems slow to me but I have a decent internet connection. One
> thing to note is that Evo does a lot of client-side caching in your
> ~/.evolution directory, which means the first time a folder is visited
> after you've created an account, it will be pretty slow. Subsequent
> visits
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 02:29 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Unfortunately, your mail client encapsulated the screenshot in ms-tnef
> (Microsoft Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format) which is a
> proprietary Microsoft encapsulation format that I don't have a decoder
> for on my Linux system. So, I ca
OK, that last problem has been fixed and Evolution now starts properly. I have
no idea why that library was not present as it should be, but now it is.
However, Evo still isn't quite working for me. This time, it's the Exchange
configuration. At the receiving messages stage, I do not get all th
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 10:44 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> Just timed opening a new message at over 2 minutes. The folder had
> been opened before. It's quite a big folder - 1600 messages - but the
> message itself is only 6k.
Hm. I don't have folders that big but others have posted here with much
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:51 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> Well, you'll be amazed to hear that it is finally working. The final
> problem was that the "exchange operations" plugin was not switched on
> - possibly it should count as a bug that the "exchange" item on the
> combo-box was still availabl
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 09:26 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> OK, that last problem has been fixed and Evolution now starts
> properly. I have no idea why that library was not present as it should
> be, but now it is.
I suspect it was related to the problem with evo install failing. This
is still pr
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 08:49 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> failed with `libeabutil.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or directory'
Oh yeah, that's very bad. Things will definitely not work.
However, on my system that library is happily sitting
in /opt/evo/lib/evolution/2.12. ex
Yes, I am using the script. I've tried what you suggested and still no luck. I
think the problem is that not all the libraries have been installed properly.
Here is the log file:
CalDAV Eplugin starting up ...
(evolution:5781): evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot activate
'OAFIID:GNOME_Evolut
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 11:42 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> However, I am still without a working Evo. It starts up fine, but I
> get an interface with only the Send/Receive button and many of the
> sub-menus are empty. The preferences dialog is also empty. I did get a
> lot of warnings like this:
J
(Let me know if you'd prefer to take this conversation off-list)
Sorry, it was foolish of me to use the old Makefile when you'd sent an update.
The new one you sent compiled everything without errors.
However, I am still without a working Evo. It starts up fine, but I get an
interface with onl
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 15:20 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> Then I tried the Makefile provided by Paul Smith. This is indeed a
> very clever piece of software and it did most of the installation for
> me. There were a few problems, however.
Hi Peter; glad it (sort of) worked for you. I've attached
Hi there,
First of all, I apologise for the negative comments in my previous post
- Paul was absolutely right about them being unhelpful. Evolution is an
impressive tool, and it is hardly fair to blame it for struggling to
have perfect interaction with a proprietary mail service, especially one
pr
Actually, there's still a build bug in evolution which will cause this
makefile to fail the first time you run it. I thought it had been
fixed, but really the build bug was just masked because I was installing
it into an already-populated directory.
Attached to this email please find a new makefi
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 20:21 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> re building -- this list is a great resource -- if you are willing give
> it a try, others will try to address any issues you run into...
>
> > Even given a few annoying things that still exist in the current SVN
> > codebase (some of whic
re building -- this list is a great resource -- if you are willing give
it a try, others will try to address any issues you run into...
> Even given a few annoying things that still exist in the current SVN
> codebase (some of which I still hope will be fixed before 2.12 is
> released), 2.12 is m
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> > Or, you can build the latest version yourself if you want to go that
> > route. It's not trivial but it's not too bad.
> I've had a quick go at this. Evo 2.12 is not available from the main
> downloads page:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/pro
Try unchecking "Check for new mail in all folders" under
Preferences->account->Receiving Options. Unchecking means Evo will only
check the Inbox. Unfortunately there's currently no way to check just
some of your other remote folders (apart from unsubscribing them).
poc
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 01:28
On 22/08/2007, Peter Saffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it says "Scanning for changed messages" and then "Fetching summary
> information for new messages". Each stage takes several minutes for each
> folder, even though these folders have not changed since I last looked
> at them. If I hit "send
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 18:18 +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> > I've had a quick go at this. Evo 2.12 is not available from the main
> > downloads page:
> >
> > http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/download.shtml
> >
> That's clearly a bug. And we need you to discover them :)
Evolution 2.12 hasn
Hi,
On Fr, 2007-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 01:25 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Or, you can build the latest version yourself if you want to go that
> > route. It's not trivial but it's not too bad.
> >
>
> I've had a quick go at this. Evo 2.12 is not avail
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> > Or, you can build the latest version yourself if you want to go that
> > route. It's not trivial but it's not too bad.
see
http://www.go-evolution.org/Compiling_Evolution_from_SVN
> I've had a quick go at this. Evo 2.12 is not available
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 01:25 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> What version of Ubuntu are you using? Saying you're using Evo 2 doesn't
> tell us much: Evo 2.0 was released years ago. The current stable
> version, provided in Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) is Evo 2.10.
>
That's the one I'm using.
> Or, you
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:52 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> However, actually accessing the
> contents is extremely slow. When I click on a folder for the first time,
> it says "Scanning for changed messages" and then "Fetching summary
> information for new messages". Each stage takes several minutes
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:52 +0100, Peter Saffrey wrote:
> I've just moved back to Ubuntu after a year working in Windows.
What version of Ubuntu are you using? Saying you're using Evo 2 doesn't
tell us much: Evo 2.0 was released years ago. The current stable
version, provided in Ubuntu 7.04 (Fei
25 matches
Mail list logo
