On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 22:59 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 07:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > AFAIK Scheme is actually the scripting language for GNU.
>
> Not quite. Scheme is a programming language based on LISP. There is a
> standard, etc. See http://swiss.csail.mi
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 07:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> AFAIK Scheme is actually the scripting language for GNU.
Not quite. Scheme is a programming language based on LISP. There is a
standard, etc. See http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/projects/scheme/
The "scripting language for GNU" you're
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 10:52 +0200, Stan Goodman wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 20:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 01:17 +0200, Stan Goodman wrote:
> > > 1) I've scanned the User's Guide and read parts that I needed at the
> > > moment. I'm now in the process of build
> >
> > The 24 hour / 12 hour is only for calendar and tasks - the format for
> > mail listings is taken from the Locale of your setup. I'm sure that
> > must be in the FAQ somewhere.
>
> Actually, the Calendar is showing 24hour times. Hard to remember which
> is which?
>
> On the other hand,
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 01:42 -0500, Stan Goodman wrote:
> > > Additional question (I joined this list only last night}: Is it
> possible
> > > to configure the list so that it is THE LIST'S address that comes
> up in
> > > replying, rather than the composer's?
> >
> > That's a holy war issue. IMHO
** Reply to message from "Art Alexion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 14 Jan 2008
09:00:04 -0500
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 01:42 -0500, Stan Goodman wrote:
> > > > Additional question (I joined this list only last night}: Is it
> > possible
> > > > to configure the list so that it is THE LIST'S addres
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 08:58 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 10:52 +0200, Stan Goodman wrote:
> > I had no idea that Scheme was not a scripting language specific to
> > Evolution (the User's Guide gives no hint one way or the other). Had I
> > seen this hit, I would probably ha
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 12:58 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > I searched on something like (with another
> > term or two. I did that because searching for a common word like
> > "scheme" alone seemed hopeless. The same would have been true for a
> > search on "evolution" alone. Naming progams for
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 10:52 +0200, Stan Goodman wrote:
> I had no idea that Scheme was not a scripting language specific to
> Evolution (the User's Guide gives no hint one way or the other). Had I
> seen this hit, I would probably have ignored it. "Scheme" means so many
> things.
>
> I searched on
>
> I searched on something like (with another
> term or two. I did that because searching for a common word like
> "scheme" alone seemed hopeless. The same would have been true for a
> search on "evolution" alone. Naming progams for common words is not the
> cleverest nor the most helpful idea.
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 01:17 +0200, Stan Goodman wrote:
> 1) I've scanned the User's Guide and read parts that I needed at the
> moment. I'm now in the process of building a system of filters; for my
> purposes, apparently will need to use the "Scheme Language" mentioned
> exactly twice in the Guid
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 20:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 01:17 +0200, Stan Goodman wrote:
> > 1) I've scanned the User's Guide and read parts that I needed at the
> > moment. I'm now in the process of building a system of filters; for my
> > purposes, apparently will
12 matches
Mail list logo
