Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 12:44 -0400 schrieb Paul Smith:
(...)
>
> If your goal with staying back with Ubuntu 12.04 is to avoid GNOME 3,
BTW (and as we've gone OT anyway): As I'm using Evolution 3.2.3 here,
shouldn't I be on Gnome 3.2 at least ? (never cared how to check, what
gnome is under
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 18:18 +0200, Tom wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 05.06.2015, 21:45 +0400 schrieb Emre Erenoglu: (...)
> > Note that Xubuntu 14.04 Evolution packages are pretty old, even
> > ancient (3.10 if I understand right). Even Vivid 15.04 has very old
> > packages. So I compile my own from ti
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 20:38 +0200, Roy Reese wrote:
> (Apologies to Patrick who just received this as an off-list message
> as a result of my mistake.)
No worries, but please remember to post in plaintext, not HTML
(ironically, your private message to me *was* in plaintext :
-)
poc
_
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:33 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > For me, it's less stable than the latest 3.12.x.
> Depends on use case as I said. 3.12 does not support Webkit2 HTML
> composing so not possible to use it at work for me. 3.16 may have bugs
> but it has less on EWS and does webkit
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
>
> The problem is to setup initial build environment. Then each new release, if
> it still is compatible with the system Gnome libs, compiles easily.
>
> Here's what I do, but I may be missing steps since it's been a few months
> since I se
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:09 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > If you are not experienced in compiling stuff, I strongly recommend
> > you to upgrade to Ubuntu 15.04 and then simply add the PPA I've given
> > to use 3.16 which is pretty OK.
>
> I
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:09 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> If you are not experienced in compiling stuff, I strongly recommend
> you to upgrade to Ubuntu 15.04 and then simply add the PPA I've given
> to use 3.16 which is pretty OK.
It's great to have this PPA, but Evo 3.16.0 has some pretty signif
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:44 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> And, it requires a modern version of GNOME (in
> particular, no older than one release back... so for Evolution 3.16.x
> that means you must have GNOME 3.14 or 3.16).
Hi,
just to clarify, there was no dependency bump in the sources f
On Jun 9, 2015 19:19, "Tom" wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, den 05.06.2015, 21:45 +0400 schrieb Emre Erenoglu: (...)
> > Note that Xubuntu 14.04 Evolution packages are pretty old, even
> > ancient (3.10 if I understand right). Even Vivid 15.04 has very old
> > packages. So I compile my own from time to tim
On Jun 9, 2015 21:51, "Paul Smith" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 20:38 +0200, Roy Reese wrote:
> > Version numbers at the moment exaggerate the situation a bit given
> > that version numbers in Evo were changed to match Gnome.
>
> Although you're right that Evo in Ubuntu 15.04 is only one versi
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 20:38 +0200, Roy Reese wrote:
> Version numbers at the moment exaggerate the situation a bit given
> that version numbers in Evo were changed to match Gnome.
Although you're right that Evo in Ubuntu 15.04 is only one version
behind the latest, it's misleading because Evo only
> Enviar: martes 9 de junio de 2015 a las 18:29
> De: "Patrick O'Callaghan"
>On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 18:18 +0200, Tom wrote:
>> I'd love to compile my own Evolution from time to time - as
>> practically everyone here on the list seems to do from the sound of
>> it ?!!
> I'm not sure how you got
On 06/09/2015 10:18 AM, Tom wrote:
> But there seems to be not even one simple "cookbook" to do it, but lots
> of comments, that those distros that don't keep Evolution up to a recent
> version are dirt cheap.
It has been years but the two ways that I have used to compile Evolution
is Gentoo Linux
> > Note that Xubuntu 14.04 Evolution packages are pretty old, even
> > ancient (3.10 if I understand right). Even Vivid 15.04 has very old
> > packages. So I compile my own from time to time. Alternatively, if you
> > upgrade to Vivid 15.04, you can use Fabien Tassin PPA here:
> > https://launchp
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 18:18 +0200, Tom wrote:
> I'm often noticed - particularly on this list, that my Evolution
> packages are pretty old, even ancient (and here it's 3.2.3 as it came
> with Precise and it will doggonit stay as long as Precise stays or
> I'll find a safe way to do, what Emre Ereno
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 18:18 +0200, Tom wrote:
> I'd love to compile my own Evolution from time to time - as
> practically everyone here on the list seems to do from the sound of
> it ?!!
I'm not sure how you got that idea. I would guess that almost nobody
compiles Evo for themselves. It's quite
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:35 +0100, Thomas Novin wrote:
> /usr/local/samba/include/ndr.h:420: error: expected declaration
http://www.go-evolution.org/MAPI_FAQ had the solution :)
Rgds
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail
Jon,
If you are looking at doing this, you can contact Sankar (Cced in this
mail)
He was involved in the porting 2.6 to Mac.
-Srini.
PS: You may not get a reply for rest of the week, due to the holidays.
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 13:21 -0800, Jon Saints wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am considering compiling
On Dec 24, 2007 2:51 AM, Jon Saints <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am considering compiling evolution for Mac OS X. I
> notice that there is a version for evolution 2.6 out
> there already, but I thought it would be nice to have
> the newer version.
>
> Does anyone know if this should be p
Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 05:46 +0100 schrieb guenther:
http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/download.shtml
yup, okay, got it from there but while trying to install this I get:
[shell]
Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you shoul
> > > > http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/download.shtml
> > >
> > > yup, okay, got it from there but while trying to install this I get:
> > > [shell]
> > > Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
> > >
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 05:46 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > > http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/download.shtml
> >
> > yup, okay, got it from there but while trying to install this I get:
> > [shell]
> > Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > Perhaps you should add
> > http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/download.shtml
>
> yup, okay, got it from there but while trying to install this I get:
> [shell]
> Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH envir
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 02:39 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > what does "rpm -qa|grep atk" return? do you have atk-devel installed?
> > what does "echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH" return?
>
> There we go:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> su
> Password:
> linux:/home/reg # rpm -qa|grep atk
> atk-1.10.3-2
> atk-1
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 02:37 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > > Package libgtkhtml-3.8 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgtkhtml-3.8.pc'
> > > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> > > No package 'libgtkhtml-3.8' fou
> > what does "rpm -qa|grep atk" return? do you have atk-devel installed?
> > what does "echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH" return?
>
> There we go:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> su
> Password:
> linux:/home/reg # rpm -qa|grep atk
> atk-1.10.3-2
> atk-1.9.1-4
Side note: You don't need root privileges, just to quer
> > > Package libgtkhtml-3.8 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgtkhtml-3.8.pc'
> > > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> > > No package 'libgtkhtml-3.8' found
> > > configure: error: Package requirements (libgtkhtml-3.8
Am Freitag, den 20.01.2006, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> hi ron,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 19.01.2006, 22:33 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler (Mobile):
> > Am Freitag, den 20.01.2006, 11:28 +0530 schrieb Harish:
> > > You need to install atk-devel which provides the required pc file to
> > > build e
hi ron,
Am Donnerstag, den 19.01.2006, 22:33 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler (Mobile):
> Am Freitag, den 20.01.2006, 11:28 +0530 schrieb Harish:
> > You need to install atk-devel which provides the required pc file to
> > build evolution further.
> >
> > Harish
> >
> Ok, I now get:
> Package libgtkhtm
Am Freitag, den 20.01.2006, 11:28 +0530 schrieb Harish:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 20:39 -0800, Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
> > linux:/home/reg # rpm -qa|grep atk
> > atk-1.10.3-2
> > atk-1.9.1-4
>
> You need to install atk-devel which provides the required pc file to
> build evolution further.
>
> H
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 20:39 -0800, Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
> linux:/home/reg # rpm -qa|grep atk
> atk-1.10.3-2
> atk-1.9.1-4
You need to install atk-devel which provides the required pc file to
build evolution further.
Harish
___
Evolution-list mail
Am Montag, den 16.01.2006, 15:18 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> hi ron,
>
> Am Freitag, den 13.01.2006, 10:55 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler (Mobile):
> > I try to install the latest Version (2.4.2.1) of Evolution. When I run
> > the configure script I get that:
> > Package atk was not found in the pkg-
hi ron,
Am Freitag, den 13.01.2006, 10:55 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler (Mobile):
> I try to install the latest Version (2.4.2.1) of Evolution. When I run
> the configure script I get that:
> Package atk was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `atk
chen wrote:
You need to have open_ldap installed for exchange support. You can set
the --with-openldap if u have it installed in some prefix.
And also with kerberos.
-- Sarfraaz
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail
You need to have open_ldap installed for exchange support. You can set
the --with-openldap if u have it installed in some prefix.
thanks, Chenthill.
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:24 -0800, Eliezer Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile evolution-data-server-1.4.1.1
> from source.
>
> at the en
35 matches
Mail list logo
