Am 21.10.2009, 00:14 Uhr, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan :
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Personally my favorite Evo-only feature (at least I've not seen other
mail clients who use it) is how if you select a part of the message
then reply, then only that part is quoted in you
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:46 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 08:24 -0400, Edgar Matzinger wrote:
> > Hi Art,
> > > As an editor, it is worse than Outlook (which is worse than anything
> > True.
> > > else) because it prohibits (not merely discourages) trimming and
> > > bottom post
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 08:24 -0400, Edgar Matzinger wrote:
>
> Hi Art,
> >
> > As an editor, it is worse than Outlook (which is worse than anything
>
> True.
>
> > else) because it prohibits (not merely discourages) trimming and
> > bottom posting.
>
> Nonsense, outlook only discourages bottom p
Hi Art,
>
> As an editor, it is worse than Outlook (which is worse than anything
True.
> else) because it prohibits (not merely discourages) trimming and
> bottom posting.
Nonsense, outlook only discourages bottom posting. You can easily
edit/trim your post before sending it off. I do so regurl
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:51 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:43 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
> > Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled. Ofc, Evo behaves better
> > than OutLook and I know that I can ma
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:50 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> Ironically, thinking back 15-18 years ago, it was the aol users we
> hated because their mailer didn't quote anything and it was hard to
> gauge context. You would get an email that just said, "yes" from
> someone you hadn't recently asked a
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Personally my favorite Evo-only feature (at least I've not seen other
> mail clients who use it) is how if you select a part of the message
> then reply, then only that part is quoted in your reply.
I also love this, but it's not unique to Evo
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Personally my favorite Evo-only feature (at least I've not seen other
> mail clients who use it) is how if you select a part of the message
> then
> reply, then only that part is quoted in your reply. If you get used
> to
> this feature, then
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:35:56 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
> I thought the OpenMoko/Neo phones were merely
> theoretical, because, until someone on this list mentioned one, I have
> never heard of an actual sighting.
I use an Openmoko FR as my daily and only mobile phone.
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 22:34 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:23:28 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
>
> > > This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
> > > Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled.
> >
> > Matthais,
> >
> > Weren't y
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:35 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> > Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't
> read
> > the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
> > everything.
>
> Am I the on
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:23:28 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
> > This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
> > Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled.
>
> Matthais,
>
> Weren't you the one chastising me for using a work-mandated Blackberry?
Don't know
Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:07 -0400, bgzgn...@sf.porterfield.net wrote:
>> Matthias Apitz wrote:
> try dG
Wow, that's even better! Totally OT now, but I love vim more and more. :)
--
Sean
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-l
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 04:20:51 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
> I can do it it with 3 -- 2, if you count combos as 1.
> Shift+End,Del
>
> Undo it, Ctrl+z.
>
> Moreover, it works like every other text editor I use so I don't need
> the additional step of looking up an arcane key com
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:43 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 03:28:53 -0400, Art Alexion
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like
> 'mutt')
> > > and a good text
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 16:07 -0400, bgzgn...@sf.porterfield.net wrote:
> delete to end is hold Shift and Ctrl then press and
> release End then press Del. Four keys vs 5.
I can do it it with 3 -- 2, if you count combos as 1.
Shift+End,Del
Undo it, Ctrl+z.
Moreover, it works like every other text
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:46, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:10 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Its much easier to top post to non-mailing list clients.
bg:
That is an astonishin
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Only one example: with .,$d i.e. with 5 key strokes I can remove
> all from the actual line until the end of the text. An with one
> key 'u' I get it back.
I love vim! Just wanted to make sure I clarified that first. And, I
didn't know about .,$d - very cool. I've just
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 03:28:53PM -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like 'mutt')
> > and a good text editor (like 'vim'), as I do.
>
> Matthias, I am clueless as to why you monitor and pa
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:57:10PM -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
>
> >
> > El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:32:59 -0400, Ben May escribió:
> >
> > > All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
> > > there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying t
> The whole point of my suggestion is that I like choice, as do a lot of
> others. We'll NEVER get the bottom-posters to agree that anything other
> than bottom-posting is acceptable, and you'll NEVER get people who
> aren't aware of the argument or who are agnostic to its outcome to
> follow all
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:41 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> > > Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't read
> > > the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
> > > everything.
> >
> > Am
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:43 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> This, using Evo, is required because in business I have to use an
> Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP disabled. Ofc, Evo behaves better
> than OutLook and I know that I can mark text before hitting reply
> (but only one part of the old tex
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:10 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel escribió:
>
> > Its much easier to top post to non-mailing list clients. You need to
> > realize, most people are not computer savy and don't care about the
> > "netiquet
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> ... They responded that that wasn't
> really the idea, since the poster is meant to edit the quote (removing
> irrelevant material and inserting comments) and that's easier to do from
> the top down. Nevertheless they did agree to incl
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 03:28:53 -0400, Art Alexion escribió:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like 'mutt')
> > and a good text editor (like 'vim'), as I do.
>
> Matthias, I am clueless as to why yo
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> > Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't read
> > the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
> > everything.
>
> Am I the only one getting that's getting a *really* bad feeling about
> the
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:33 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> Plus, I prefer not to trim because if I am on my BB, and I didn't read
> the first post, I can read the middle and understand the gist of
> everything.
Am I the only one getting that's getting a *really* bad feeling about
the long-term eff
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:32 -0400, Ben May wrote:
> All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
> there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
> mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
>
> For regular reply or reply-to-all: {Use
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:57 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> > They get confused and it makes more work
> > for me to try and explain it. 90% of all users I email use top post
> > except
> > for mailing lists.
>
> You can minimize that confusion with proper trimming. With Evo (to get
> this back o
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:10 -0400, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> All this would not happen if you use a realy good MUA (like 'mutt')
> and a good text editor (like 'vim'), as I do.
Matthias, I am clueless as to why you monitor and participate in this
list devoted to Evo if you use mutt and vim, and beli
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:57 -0400, Derek McDaniel wrote:
> They get confused and it makes more work
> for me to try and explain it. 90% of all users I email use top post
> except
> for mailing lists.
You can minimize that confusion with proper trimming. With Evo (to get
this back on topic), trimm
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:32 -0400, Ben May wrote:
> All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
> there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
> mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
>
> For regular reply or reply-to-all: {Use
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:57:10 -0400, Derek McDaniel escribió:
> Its much easier to top post to non-mailing list clients. You need to
> realize, most people are not computer savy and don't care about the
> "netiquette" as much as Linux users do. I wont bottom post to a client or
>
>
> El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:32:59 -0400, Ben May escribió:
>
> > All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
> > there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
> > mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
> >
> > F
El día martes, octubre 20, 2009 a las 02:32:59 -0400, Ben May escribió:
> All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
> there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
> mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
>
> For regular repl
All this discussion of top versus bottom posting got me thinking. If
there's ALREADY a function in evolution specifically for replying to
mailing lists, couldn't we add configurations where you set:
For regular reply or reply-to-all: {Use top posting / Use bottom
posting}
For reply-to-mailing list
37 matches
Mail list logo
