On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 11:26 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Well ... maybe I had to close evolution with --force-close, and not
> only with the WM close button: today (after a shutdown) "it works" as
> expected.
Hi,
good.
> Thanks for your time, and sorry for this mistake.
I do not think i
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 10:40 +0100, Milan Crha a écrit :
> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 18:25 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > Sorting config is good, but threads stay as they are.
> > How should I check if the gconf is good ?
>
> Hi,
> probably only with gdb, and even that may work only if the
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 18:25 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Sorting config is good, but threads stay as they are.
> How should I check if the gconf is good ?
Hi,
probably only with gdb, and even that may work only if the corresponding
variable is not optimized out during the compile. In func
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 12:10 +0100, Milan Crha a écrit :
> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:35 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > The thread_latest is on. I unchecked it, restarted evo: no change.
> > re-checked it, restarted evo: no change again.
> >
> > thread_list and thread_expand are true too, th
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:35 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> The thread_latest is on. I unchecked it, restarted evo: no change.
> re-checked it, restarted evo: no change again.
>
> thread_list and thread_expand are true too, thread_subject is false.
Hi,
hmm, then I may guess that there is s
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 10:46 +0100, Milan Crha a écrit :
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads
> > was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them
> > ("thread date" was the las
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads
> was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them
> ("thread date" was the last message's date). Now thez left where they
> lie, so when a mail arrive
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:11 +0100, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads
> was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them
> ("thread date" was the last message's date). Now thez left where they
> lie, so when a
Hello,
Since the last upgrade to Evolution 3.2.1 (was 2.32 I think), threads
was pushed to end of the list when a new mail was inserted into them
("thread date" was the last message's date). Now thez left where they
lie, so when a mail arrives in a 6-month-old thread of my "OS-lists
folder", I hav
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:15 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
And I third it and I am sure there are forty-eleven people behind me.
But seriously, the hard work has been done if a collapsed thread will
sort by the newest message in it surely. It sounds like the treatment
of expanded threads is more po
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 12:10 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> I would prefer if it would also sort the uncollapsed threads as well
> though. Do you know whether this is going to be implemented at some
> point? Should I open a bug report?
>
> nick
>
>
I second this...
_
I would prefer if it would also sort the uncollapsed threads as well
though. Do you know whether this is going to be implemented at some
point? Should I open a bug report?
nick
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 23:40 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> In 2.8.x onwards, if the thread is collapsed, the date o
In 2.8.x onwards, if the thread is collapsed, the date of the thread is
considered to be the date of the most recent message in the thread. But
if it is expanded, it doesnt follow this. You can collapse all threads
(View->Collapse All Threads) may be once in a while to know, if any new
messages pop
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:32 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message
> which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of
> the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread
> gets placed i
Hello list,
I sort my INBOX by date and group messages by thread. A new message
which is not part of a thread gets placed as expected at the bottom of
the message list. However, a new message which is part of a thread gets
placed into the thread, and the thread does not move to the bottom of
the m
15 matches
Mail list logo
