On 2012-01-07, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Is there a way to select which messages should be chosen for
> deletion? In my situation it looks like it would be good to default
> to delete the newly downloaded messages. But in any case either the
> meta data which message were replied to should be kept s
Dear Evolution folks,
for some reason my whole POP3 inbox, where messages are not deleted
after being fetched, was downloaded again and therefore I had several
duplicates.
Before I had replied to some of these messages and these were marked
with the red arrow for reply. The newly fetched duplica
> > > Do you know if there's a bug open for "evolution sometimes downloads
> > > dupes from the POP server" already? It should be set as related to this
> > > one. ;-)
> >
> > must of them should be NEEDINFO or NOTABUG, e.g.
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317599
>
> Yeah I can't
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 23:35 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 17:27 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > Do you know if there's a bug open for "evolution sometimes downloads
> > dupes from the POP server" already? It should be set as related to this
> > one. ;-)
>
>
hi lee,
Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 17:27 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> Do you know if there's a bug open for "evolution sometimes downloads
> dupes from the POP server" already? It should be set as related to this
> one. ;-)
must of them should be NEEDINFO or NOTABUG, e.g.
http://bugzilla.gnome.
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 23:17 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Hints like this preferably should be added to the proper bug report in
> bugzilla, though. Posts to the list tend to be forgotten...
Do you know if there's a bug open for "evolution sometimes downloads
dupes from the POP server" already? It sho
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 23:17 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Hints like this preferably should be added to the proper bug report in
> bugzilla, though. Posts to the list tend to be forgotten...
Added to bug 253244.
Lee
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 16:50 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:31 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > > I think every email has an Message-ID. Why not just delete duplicates
> > > > > by Message-ID? I think also to mailing lists, the message id is the
> > > > > same.
> > > >
> > > >
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:31 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > I think every email has an Message-ID. Why not just delete duplicates
> > > > by Message-ID? I think also to mailing lists, the message id is the
> > > > same.
> > >
> > > Yes, they will be the same when Replying to All. Anyway, Message-
> > > I think every email has an Message-ID. Why not just delete duplicates
> > > by Message-ID? I think also to mailing lists, the message id is the
> > > same.
> >
> > Yes, they will be the same when Replying to All. Anyway, Message-Id's
> > are not *guaranteed* to be unique. Although, grante
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 21:30 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > Note that there is an ambiguity in how you define duplicate messages.
> > > Multiple downloading from pop server results in true duplicates, but the
> > > "reply to all" generally does not (the headers will have minor
> > > differences).
> >
> > Note that there is an ambiguity in how you define duplicate messages.
> > Multiple downloading from pop server results in true duplicates, but the
> > "reply to all" generally does not (the headers will have minor
> > differences).
>
> Thanks for that. I didn't tell you that I use IMAP and
Am Donnerstag, den 01.12.2005, 09:32 -0500 schrieb Graham Campbell:
>
> Note that there is an ambiguity in how you define duplicate messages.
> Multiple downloading from pop server results in true duplicates, but the
> "reply to all" generally does not (the headers will have minor
> differences).
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:32 -0500, Graham Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:40 +0100, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > Duplicate Emails are a result of multiple (accidently) downloading an
> > email from a pop server, (inaccidently) if someone sends the mail to two
> > or
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:40 +0100, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Duplicate Emails are a result of multiple (accidently) downloading an
> email from a pop server, (inaccidently) if someone sends the mail to two
> or more addresses from my own which will be collected into one folder,
>
Oh, the second entry on this site is from myselfe. I asked for this one
time...
thanks,
Martin
Am Donnerstag, den 01.12.2005, 18:13 +0530 schrieb chen:
> We get a lot of duplicate emails when subscribed to many mailing list
> too. There is a feature request filed for it already
> http://bugzilla
We get a lot of duplicate emails when subscribed to many mailing list
too. There is a feature request filed for it already
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253244 . It would be a really
good to have this. Partha ?
thanks, Chenthill.
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:40 +0100, Martin Klaffenboeck
Hi there!
Duplicate Emails are a result of multiple (accidently) downloading an
email from a pop server, (inaccidently) if someone sends the mail to two
or more addresses from my own which will be collected into one folder,
or if someone presses 'apply to all' when answering to one of my mailing
l
18 matches
Mail list logo
