On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:44:26 +0200
Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 12:44 -0500, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > Sep 14 03:09:56 DebianTim evolution-calen[3387]: GError set over the
> > top of a previous GError or uninitialized memory.#012This indicates
>
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 12:44 -0500, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> Sep 14 03:09:56 DebianTim evolution-calen[3387]: GError set over the
> top of a previous GError or uninitialized memory.#012This indicates a
> bug in someone's code. You must ensure an error is NULL before it's
> set.#012T
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 12:44 -0500, Tim McConnell wrote:
> Since I upgraded to 3.45.3-2 yesterday, how do I fix it?
You could run under valgrind and/or gdb to find the offending code,
write a patch, and apply it after compiling the software yourself.
Cheers,
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.ne
Hi List,
My logs have been showing:
Sep 14 03:09:56 DebianTim evolution-calen[3387]: GError set over the
top of a previous GError or uninitialized memory.#012This indicates a
bug in someone's code. You must ensure an error is NULL before it's
set.#012The overwriting error message was: SQLite error
-Original Message-
From: Andre Klapper
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] new version
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:35:36 +0100
Mailer: Evolution 3.10.2 (3.10.2-2.fc20)
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 03:37 -0700, Bart wrote:
> I can't get evolution-tray to work. I mis
Anything Evolution related in ~/.xsession-errors? If there should be
something, then it might give you a hint. If not, it can't harm to start
Evolution in Konsole.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or un
-Original Message-
From: Adam Tauno Williams
Reply-to: awill...@whitemice.org
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] new version
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:39:07 -0500
Mailer: Evolution 3.10.1
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 03:37 -0700, Bart wrote:
> openSUSE released th
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 03:37 -0700, Bart wrote:
> openSUSE released their latest version, 13.1. Included is evolution
> 3.10.1 and naturally, this is what I'm now using.
Same here.
> My impressions are really positive and the installation/upgrade went
> rather smoothly.
Ditto.
> There is a ne
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 03:37 -0700, Bart wrote:
> I can't get evolution-tray to work. I miss it! I have installed
> version 0.0.8-14.1.3 . I tried version 0.0.8-41-5 but it didn't
> work either, so I reverted to the version supplied with the
> distribution.
Which desktop environment do you use
This is a Suse related issue! I used this not that much outdated version
of Evolution some time ago too, but didn't experience _this_ issue for
Arch Linux. I also try to find a MUA that is better than Evolution,
because I'm ... of all the issues, but until now Evolution still is the
best MUA for my
openSUSE released their latest version, 13.1. Included is evolution
3.10.1 and naturally, this is what I'm now using.
My impressions are really positive and the installation/upgrade went
rather smoothly.
There is a new look; fonts, icons, and a few changes in locations of
"things". Don't kno
Hi all;
I've released version 2.00 of my makefile; you can find it here as
always:
http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
I bumped the version to 2.00 because this version does non-local builds
using GNU autotools' remote build capability. This means the source
directories checked out f
Hi all;
I've posted a newer version of my Evolution-from-SVN Makefile.
http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
There is not much change here, but what's there is intended to side-step
the current messy situation with libsoup (and to let the newest libsoup
build with a test build of the newer
Hi all;
I've posted the latest version of my Makefile to build Evolution from
SVN:
http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
This version contains some fixes I've been making locally plus some
enhancements from Patrick Ohly. Changes from the previous version:
* Support for Ubuntu 7.
On Di, 2007-10-02 at 18:42 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Anyway, if you want a simple way to build Evo from SVN without
> rebuilding all of Gnome (as with GARNOME), give it a whirl!
>
> http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
Thanks a lot for this, I found it very useful. It did not quite do
Hi all;
I just uploaded a new version of my Makefile to build Evo from SVN.
This version allows for building the current SVN trunk HEAD (up until
today I was building on the 2.20 branch).
Thanks to Reid Thompson for pointing out that gnome-icon-theme is now
necessary for the build. I also added
Hi all;
I recently made some enhancements to my makefile to build Evo (and other
tools: libsoup, gtkhtml, e-d-s, evo, evo-exchange, evo-webcal) from SVN:
http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
It will create a new SVN workspace for each package if you don't have
one; update the contents
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 08:48 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 21:25 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> > Yes, that's true. I even found my contacts and calendar back. I was used
> > at the buttons in the sidebar where you could choose between contacts,
> > calender and mail. I found t
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 21:25 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> Yes, that's true. I even found my contacts and calendar back. I was used
> at the buttons in the sidebar where you could choose between contacts,
> calender and mail. I found them back under Window in the View menu.
> Definitely less user-friend
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 21:25 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> >
> Yes, that's true. I even found my contacts and calendar back. I was used
> at the buttons in the sidebar where you could choose between contacts,
> calender and mail. I found them back under Window in the View menu.
> Definitely less user-f
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:20 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:41 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> Oh.. we did reply. You can check the archives.
>
> I've just done this a few days ago and it went w/o problems. I had to
> copy a few files (filters/addressbook) etc and then
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:41 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> Hi,
> Two days ago I posted a request for some help with a problem with Evo
> 2.6.0. I sent it with that version but as I didn't get any reply,
Oh.. we did reply. You can check the archives.
> Hi,
> I have a little problem due to the fact that
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 16:38 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 00:33 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a little problem due to the fact that I changed from Evolution
> > 2.4.3 to 2.6.0 (standard FC5).
>
> Ditto but on Gentoo
>
> > I have copied from my old version the .Evo
Hi,
Two days ago I posted a request for some help with a problem with Evo
2.6.0. I sent it with that version but as I didn't get any reply, I
don't really know if it reached the list (although I received it
correctly in my Evolution folder). Therefore herby the tekst again:
Hi,
I have a little pro
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 00:33 +0200, J.L. Blom wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a little problem due to the fact that I changed from Evolution
> 2.4.3 to 2.6.0 (standard FC5).
Ditto but on Gentoo
> I have copied from my old version the .Evolution directory and
> the ,gnome2_private directory to my current hom
Hi,
I have a little problem due to the fact that I changed from Evolution
2.4.3 to 2.6.0 (standard FC5).
I have copied from my old version the .Evolution directory and
the ,gnome2_private directory to my current home directory.
Now I cant approach my address book and calendar anymore and my filters
26 matches
Mail list logo
