OK, now I feel like an idiot. :-/
You are right with the system packages of evolution. It didn't occur to me
because I typically double check before compiling that the system's
packages are uninstalled. I guess I am just getting old and forgetful!
I typically install the distro's evolution de
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 16:36 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 13:06 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > Why did you repost this?
> Hi,
> it seems to me that this message was in the list's to-review-by-list-
> admins queue, because it's shown in the message list as sent ~
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 13:06 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Why did you repost this?
Hi,
it seems to me that this message was in the list's to-review-by-list-
admins queue, because it's shown in the message list as sent ~30
minutes earlier than the one from yesterday, only from a diffe
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 15:43 +, Emilio Recio wrote:
> I have successfully compiled and installed 3.18.5 on two other boxes
> of OpenSUSE 42.1 - 64-bit.
Why did you repost this?
poc
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change yo
I have successfully compiled and installed 3.18.5 on two other boxes of
OpenSUSE 42.1 - 64-bit.
I am running into a curious issue with the "make install" phase of the
second package "evolution-3.18.5" of the third box. Everything compiles
and links correctly, but when I go to do a "sudo make insta
On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 12:13 -0400, E. M. Recio wrote:
> "libtool: error: error: relink 'libevolution-util.la' with the above
> command before installing it".
> ...
>
>
> libtool: warning: relinking 'libevolution-util.la'
> ...
> undefined reference to `e_util_get_source_full_name'
> ...
> undefine
I have successfully compiled and installed 3.18.5 on two other boxes of
OpenSUSE 42.1 - 64-bit.
I am running into a curious issue with the "make install" phase of the
second package "evolution-3.18.5" of the third box. Everything compiles and
links correctly, but when I go to do a "sudo make insta
