On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:59 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I think it's best not to do this. If you're really concerned about the
> intelligence of the recipient, just try to keep your first citation nice
> and short, so that your first reply is clearly visible.
This is working well for me.
>
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:59 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. "Find my answer
> > in the message below"? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
> > msg. on the list, about email-list e
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. "Find my answer
> in the message below"? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
> msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I
> haven't save the msg. for referenc
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 21:56 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote:
>
> "Thanks Patrick "Answers interspersed with quotes
> > below." is the term I was looking for."
>
> That should not be construed as sanctioning the placement of the
> backquotes
> *before* your answer - the (trimmed) backquotes should a
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 10:42 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > If I read what you say literally, it doesn't make sense to me. Why on
> > Earth would your answer be in quotes?
>
> >
> Thanks Patrick "Answers interspersed with quotes
> below." is the term I was looking for.
>
> nomnex
bg:
In this instanc
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 07:39 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. "Find my answer
> > in the message below"? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
> > msg. on the list, about email-li
> > On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > > Many people do not read quotes in the messages
> > > by the simple fact they are so accustomed
> > > to top posting answers (in the Outlook way).
> >
> > bg:
> >
> > Mild correction, sir - top posting is not "The Outlook Way".
> > Outlo
> If I read what you say literally, it doesn't make sense to me. Why on
> Earth would your answer be in quotes?
I meant: answer under the quotes (...) glad you could decode the correct
meaning.
>
> A suitable phrase for you want is: Answers interspersed with quotes
> below.
>
> poc
>
Thanks Pa
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:32 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > Many people do not read quotes in the messages
> > by the simple fact they are so accustomed to top posting answers (in the
> > Outlook way).
>
> bg:
>
> Mild correction, sir - top p
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> Many people do not read quotes in the messages
> by the simple fact they are so accustomed to top posting answers (in the
> Outlook way).
bg:
Mild correction, sir - top posting is not "The Outlook Way".
Outlook will accommodate proper bottom pos
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:20 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > I don't really understand the question. Always reply to all
> messages
> > with proper inline [aka bottom ? posting] responses and quoting. It
> > seems absurd to always say "see below" at the top of every message.
>
> I just need to correct E
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 07:39 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> > What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. "Find my
answer
> > in the message below"? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in
few
> > msg. on the list, about email-li
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. "Find my answer
> in the message below"? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
> msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I
> haven't save the msg. for referenc
What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. "Find my answer
in the message below"? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few
msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I
haven't save the msg. for reference.
Thanks
nomnex
14 matches
Mail list logo