On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 12:51 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> ISTM that this is a fairly important thing to be able to do though.
Hi,
as always, it depends on the use case. To those whom do not print it's
not a problem.
> It's worth noting that saving attachments and mbox f
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 10:51 +, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 12:17 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list
wrote:
> > I do not know the exact flatpak command, try to search
> > for "flatpak override home access" or some such term. Once you'll
> > set
> > the overr
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 12:17 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> You can open the terminal in the sandbox with:
>
> $ flatpak run --command=sh org.gnome.Evolution
>
> which should give you the same file system layout as the Evolution
> itself sees.
>
That's interesting. It shows me tha
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 11:42 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> > I guess, and only guess, the "printed" files are stored
> > there as well, but I can be wrong.
> >
>
> It seems that they are not.
Hi,
it can be the chosen place is not persistent. I would try to store the
fil
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 07:55 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> what exact errors, please? The virtual junk/trash folders gather
> messages marked as junk/trash. Those in the server side Junk/Trash
> real
> folders do not be marked as such. As you have a patched version, let
> Evolution u
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 07:48 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> first, it would be:
>
> $ WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 flatpak run org.gnome.Evolution
>
> in the Flatpak case.
>
> An option is to have a wrapper script, or add an:
>
> export WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0
>
> line into your ~/.bas
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 23:47 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> The newest version of the flatpak repo now works for me (3.44.1) but
> I still see the errors if I have the "All Mail" folder subscribed
> (using virtual folders for junk and trash), and cannot see any mail
> in Junk if it
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 01:01 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> > WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 evolution &
> >
> > (the sandbox is probably not going to be used anywhere else, but
> > just in case I wouldn't disable a sandbox if not needed)
>
> I don't see a way to do this via a desktop
On Sun, 2022-05-15 at 23:37 +0200, Ángel wrote:
> No. You only need to remove this on evolution. Such as running it
> from
> a terminal with:
> WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 evolution &
>
> (the sandbox is probably not going to be used anywhere else, but just
> in case I wouldn't disable a sandbox if not
On 2022-05-14 at 22:14 +, Dan Kortschak wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 22:43 +0200, Ángel wrote:
> > prepend with WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 to set that environment
> > variable.
> >
> > The Webkit bug is https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202363
>
> Thanks.
>
> So to work around this in a
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 22:43 +0200, Ángel wrote:
> prepend with WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 to set that environment variable.
>
> The Webkit bug is https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202363
Thanks.
So to work around this in a convenient way (allowing desktop
integration) it would be necessary to r
On 2022-05-13 at 21:47 +, Dan Kortschak wrote:
> It also brings some questions which have been answered here before,
> but
> which I can't find.
>
> * When printing to a file, flatpak gives evolution a sandbox
>filesystem. Where can I find this filesystem from outside the
>sandbox, or
On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 23:39 +, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> I tried using the flatpak, but it failed with a crash in
> a dependency, I'll try this again to see if that has been resolved.
The newest version of the flatpak repo now works for me (3.44.1) but I
still see the errors if
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 08:33 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> [imapx:A] I/O: '* LIST (\Noinferiors \All) "/" "All Mail"'
> [imapx:A] I/O: '* LIST (\Noinferiors \Junk) "/" "Spam"'
Hi,
the part between "()" are folder attributes. The \All, \Junk and other
are understood by the
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 06:10 +, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> Yes. That was essentially what I was doing, but wasn't sure of the
> scope of the conversation between the machines; -C2 helps.
It does not look wildly informative to me, but maybe it helps.
thanks
Dan
$ grep -v Gmail l
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 07:31 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Hi,
> the 'LIST' in upper case was meant as a hint. Try:
>
> $ CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx:io evolution &>/tmp/log.txt
>
> let it start and show the folders, then close it, then run:
>
> $ cat /tmp/log.txt | grep -C2 LIST
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 01:39 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 07:45 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > Could you paste a LIST response for the "All Mail" folder, please?
> ...
> I was unable to figure out exactly which lines of the log this
> cor
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 07:45 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Not the server, but the Evolution. It needs to know to treat the "All
> Mail" folder specifically. Could you paste a LIST response for the
> "All
> Mail" folder, please? The server can provide folder flags there,
> which
> ca
On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 11:55 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> When I unset "Use a Real Folder for Junk" I end up seeing two copies
> of each spam message in the evolution "Junk" folder that ends up
> holding the spam.
Hi,
I believe it's because the message is in its real fol
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 07:36 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> when the IMAP account has set to use a real Junk folder (see the
> account Properties->Defaults tab), then, any message marked as spam
> is
> moved to that folder, regardless where the message is stored (except
> of
> the spa
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 07:36 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> You can avoid the move when you disable real Junk folder in the
> account
> properties. Then you'll see two Junk/Spam folders, one from the
> server,
> the other one a virtual folder, which collects spam from the other
> fold
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 01:04 +0200, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> Do you have any idea why evolution might be asking for the move?
Hi,
when the IMAP account has set to use a real Junk folder (see the
account Properties->Defaults tab), then, any message marked as spam is
moved to
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 23:04 +, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> Though I do have a number of filter folders active
Clarifying this: "Search folders"
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or un
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 23:50 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I know nothing about the Protonmail bidge server, but it looks to me
> like Evo is asking the server to move the message, not the other way
> round. The server is objecting for some reason.
That's very helpful. Thanks. The move reques
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 21:20 +, Dan Kortschak via evolution-list
wrote:
> This log section is the conversation between evolution and an imap
> server on localhost (specifically the protonmail bridge server) after
> a
> spam message has hit the server and the ensuing synchronisation.
>
> My unde
Hi,
I would like some help understanding/confirming my understanding of a
section of an evolution log output.
I'm using an archaic versions, 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2, but that should
not be an issue here given I just want to understand something rather
than fix a behaviour.
This log section is th
26 matches
Mail list logo
