> - Original Message -
> From: "James White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: evolution-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] evolution and large mails
> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:03:29 -0400
>
>
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:17 -0400, Igor A. Nestero
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:17 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> I am not here on this forum to give advices, but in my opinion for
> people not accustomed to fixing and troubleshooting software it would be
> a good idea to switch to Thunderbird. It's not to say that Thunderbird
> is "better". But from
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:03 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> 256 MB. It should be quite enough for a small-footprint xfce4 (I do not
> run GNOME), a dozen of xterms and one mail program.
>
> Disk activity and even desktop irresponsiveness is not an issue here.
> They can be to some extent explaine
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 12:10 +0100, Peter Barnes wrote:
> But it's bad for anyone like me running a business. Perhaps
> Evolution is not robust enough and I should be using something
> like Thunderbird?
Peter,
I am not here on this forum to give advices, but in my opinion for
people not accu
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:38 -0500, Mike Dickson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:26 +0200, guenther wrote:
>
> > > I am using
> > > evolution-2.6.0-1
> > > on
> > > 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386
> > > GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > running in VMware Workstation 4.5.2
Heh, yes. Once you see how slick it works - you become addicted. You
gather up the questions in the discussion forum - assign moderators and
then publish both questions and answers in the "Known Issues" section of
the wiki. Support becomes so much easier.
James
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 18:56 -040
So, a serial Support Wiki suggester eh? We'll have to keep an eye on
you :-)
poc
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 17:54 -0400, James White wrote:
> Um... Alzheimers?
>
> Sorry, I have been having this same discussion in two places.
>
> James
>
>
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 16:29 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan w
Um... Alzheimers?
Sorry, I have been having this same discussion in two places.
James
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 16:29 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Why are you talking about Abiword?
>
> poc
>
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 15:28 -0400, James White wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:08 -0400, Pat
Why are you talking about Abiword?
poc
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 15:28 -0400, James White wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:08 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > This is actually an excellent idea. It remains to be seen whether I (or
> > anyone else) can overcome the barrier of inertia that stops
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:08 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> This is actually an excellent idea. It remains to be seen whether I (or
> anyone else) can overcome the barrier of inertia that stops us from
> doing it :-)
Can anyone say how many Abiword users there ARE out there? I think that
the f
This is actually an excellent idea. It remains to be seen whether I (or
anyone else) can overcome the barrier of inertia that stops us from
doing it :-)
poc
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 08:23 -0400, James White wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 00:17 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > 14. A real manu
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 01:10 +0200, guenther wrote:
> [ large dump of random requests from bugzilla snipped ]
>
> > 13. Make "Hide Read messages" a toggle, like "Hide Deleted messages". Or
> > (less radical) a keyboard accelerator for hiding read messages. I use
> > this a *lot* for some folders.
>
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 00:47 +0200, guenther wrote:
> Regarding your undo feature: I know this is a long standing request in
> bugzilla. But interestingly, I (personally) never ever wished for such a
> thing. Since I have "deleted" mail visible [1], undoing this is like one
> click or keyboard short
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 00:47 +0200, guenther wrote:
> Regarding your undo feature: I know this is a long standing request in
> bugzilla. But interestingly, I (personally) never ever wished for such
> a
> thing. Since I have "deleted" mail visible [1], undoing this is like
> one
> click or keyboard s
[ large dump of random requests from bugzilla snipped ]
> 13. Make "Hide Read messages" a toggle, like "Hide Deleted messages". Or
> (less radical) a keyboard accelerator for hiding read messages. I use
> this a *lot* for some folders.
For a very similar thing I use Saved Searches. One of them: D
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:31 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Actually, you can't please all the people all the time, but that's not a
> reason for not trying to.
That of course is correct. And the devs definitely are trying to please
(well, almost) anyone. :)
> I use Evo as my mail client ev
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 00:17 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 14. A real manual. Not a tutorial. An actual user-readable reference
> manual that's kept in synch with Evo versions.
Great idea. And finally, here's something that YOU can do to
contribute!
Start a WIKI - call it the "Evolution
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:55 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:31 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 08:54 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
>
> > > Let me just add this. For every 10 person that uses Evo, I would say
> > > that approx 80% will find it Good and
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:31 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 08:54 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > Let me just add this. For every 10 person that uses Evo, I would say
> > that approx 80% will find it Good and the other 10% will find it Not
> > and the othe 10% just doesn't
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 08:54 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:15 +0200, guenther wrote:
> > > But it seems to have got slower even though it has received only a
> few
> > > thousand emails (which is not many for a business, even a one-man
> > > business from home). Then it crashe
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:15 +0200, guenther wrote:
> > But it seems to have got slower even though it has received only a few
> > thousand emails (which is not many for a business, even a one-man
> > business from home). Then it crashed and now I have no access to my
> > emails and no solution as y
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:56 +0200, guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:38 -0500, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:26 +0200, guenther wrote:
> >
> > > > I am using
> > > > evolution-2.6.0-1
> > > > on
> > > > 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:38 -0500, Mike Dickson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:26 +0200, guenther wrote:
>
> > > I am using
> > > evolution-2.6.0-1
> > > on
> > > 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386
> > > GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > running in VMware Workstation 4.5.2
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:26 +0200, guenther wrote:
> > I am using
> > evolution-2.6.0-1
> > on
> > 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006 i686 athlon i386
> > GNU/Linux
> >
> > running in VMware Workstation 4.5.2
>
> Well, I guess that would be why. This sure limits the resources for
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:47 -0400, Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> Today I have received rather big mail. It was of 80,000 text lines,
> which gives us about 6MB, but other than that it was pure ASCII text.
> It's automatically generated message with some sort of alarms, so
> sometimes it happens. This m
> But it seems to have got slower even though it has received only a few
> thousand emails (which is not many for a business, even a one-man
> business from home). Then it crashed and now I have no access to my
> emails and no solution as yet. No-one on the Ubuntu forums was able to
> help me - in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor A. Nesterov wrote:
> Today I have received rather big mail. It was of 80,000 text lines,
> which gives us about 6MB, but other than that it was pure ASCII text.
> It's automatically generated message with some sort of alarms, so
> sometimes it hap
> - Original Message -
> From: "Igor A. Nesterov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "evolution-list@gnome.org"
> Subject: [Evolution] evolution and large mails
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:47:57 -0400
>
>
> Today I have received rather big m
Today I have received rather big mail. It was of 80,000 text lines,
which gives us about 6MB, but other than that it was pure ASCII text.
It's automatically generated message with some sort of alarms, so
sometimes it happens. This message has practically killed Evolution and
in fact the whole deskt
29 matches
Mail list logo
