>
> The Evo team are not prepared to take responsibility for breakages
> that occur due to their product or their advice especially if it's not
> in the very few (and generally less popular) distros they bother to
> try Evo on.
Err, no.
The issue of unlocking of keys has been asked concerning
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:52 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> The Evo team are not prepared to take responsibility for breakages
> that occur due to their product or their advice especially if it's not
> in the very few (and generally less popular) distros they bother to
> try Evo on.
If you are intentio
Hi :)
That pesky "unlock keys" thing appears in quite a few different Ubuntu
forums and mailing lists. I got the same pop-up on one Ubuntu that doesn't
get used often enough for me to justify spending time trying to fix it. So
all i can suggest is to google-it (or better might be to duck-duck-go-
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 09:09 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> I am running 14.04LTS 64bit. Evolution 3.10.4 currently installed from
> Software Centre.
> 1. Is version 3.12.2 substantially better than 3.10.4? Any
>reason why not to upgrade?
There is no reason NOT to upgrade.
But the big stability
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 09:09 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> I am running 14.04LTS 64bit. Evolution 3.10.4 currently installed from
> Software Centre.
>
> 1. Is version 3.12.2 substantially better than 3.10.4? Any
> reason why not to upgrade?
I'm not aware of a reason to not upgrade, b
> I am running 14.04LTS 64bit.
That's a strange version of Fedora...
>
> 2. I have downloaded: evolution_3.12.2-1+b1_amd64.deb but not
> installed it yet.
> a)Is this the correct file?
> b) What is the "+B1"?
That is distribution specific
I am running 14.04LTS 64bit. Evolution 3.10.4 currently installed from
Software Centre.
1. Is version 3.12.2 substantially better than 3.10.4? Any
reason why not to upgrade?
2. I have downloaded: evolution_3.12.2-1+b1_amd64.deb but not
installed it yet.
