Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-16 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
ti., 13.10.2009 kl. 08.52 +0100, skrev Alpar Juttner: > I understand that you don't like top posting (neither do I), but is that > indeed _so much of a hassle_ for you that you feel entitled to advise > people rather not to post if they can only do top posting? And/or advise > them to change their

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-13 Thread Alpar Juttner
Dear Matthias, I see the closed source BB is not welcome on this list. But can I still use my open source Android here? It's built in MTA still support top posting only. I understand that you don't like top posting (neither do I), but is that indeed _so much of a hassle_ for you that you feel en

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, October 12, 2009 a las 08:30:21PM -0400, Art Alexion escribió: > I use a Blackberry because it is the phone my employer requires me to use. We > use Blackberries because we use Exchange, which incidentally, is the same > reason I use Evolution. > > You say you would never use it?

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Art Alexion
- From: Matthias Apitz To: Art Alexion Cc: awill...@opengroupware.us ; evolution-list@gnome.org Sent: Mon Oct 12 08:16:26 2009 Subject: Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ] El día Monday, October 12, 2009 a las 06:36:10AM -0400, Art Alexion escribió

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Art Alexion
-list@gnome.org Sent: Mon Oct 12 06:42:48 2009 Subject: Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ] On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 06:36:10AM -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > Sometimes, indeed, some of us just can't. Like now, when I am reading mail > on my Blackberry. >

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 14:16 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > If this is really not configurable, you're using a buggy and wrong > MTA. I think you mean MUA here. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, October 12, 2009 a las 08:20:35AM -0400, Derek McDaniel escribió: > El día Monday, October 12, 2009 a las 06:36:10AM -0400, Art Alexion > escribió: > > > Sometimes, indeed, some of us just can't. Like now, when I am reading > mail on my Blackberry. > > > > The BB inserts the entir

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Derek McDaniel
El día Monday, October 12, 2009 a las 06:36:10AM -0400, Art Alexion escribió: > Sometimes, indeed, some of us just can't. Like now, when I am reading mail on my Blackberry. > > The BB inserts the entire uneditable quote below your response. > > -- > Art Alexion > MIS/Central Office Support > R

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, October 12, 2009 a las 06:36:10AM -0400, Art Alexion escribió: > Sometimes, indeed, some of us just can't. Like now, when I am reading mail > on my Blackberry. > > The BB inserts the entire uneditable quote below your response. > > -- > Art Alexion > MIS/Central Office Support >

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Chris G
.org > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Sent: Sun Oct 11 17:15:18 2009 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ] > > > > Top Post - Good > > > Bottom Post - Good > > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-12 Thread Art Alexion
From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org To: evolution-list@gnome.org Sent: Sun Oct 11 17:15:18 2009 Subject: Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ] > > Top Post - Good > > Bottom Post - Good > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - B

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:29 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > >Top Post - Good > > Bottom Post - Good > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad > > How about a thread where some people top-po

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:15 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Top Post - Good > > > Bottom Post - Good > > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad > > How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post > > (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > Top Post - Good > > Bottom Post - Good > > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad > How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post > (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted message)? If > that is bad, why don't we just standardize ... Wh

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Top Post - Good > Bottom Post - Good > Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted message)? If th

[Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad My own opinion - jon ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evo