Hi,
On Mi, 2007-08-22 at 11:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 11:51 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > Being nice and informative towards the user is
> > the key issue here, not brutally follow standards.
>
> The standards aren't enforced by Evo, all Evo is doing is assuming tha
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 11:51 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> ons 2007-08-22 klockan 10:27 +0100 skrev Pete Biggs:
>
> > > Can someone reproduce this? It's clearly a bug (if I'm correct)
> > >
> >
> > Why is it 'clearly a bug'? The mail standard says that recipients are
> > separated by commas wi
ons 2007-08-22 klockan 10:27 +0100 skrev Pete Biggs:
> > Can someone reproduce this? It's clearly a bug (if I'm correct)
> >
>
> Why is it 'clearly a bug'? The mail standard says that recipients are
> separated by commas with the semi-colon being used to terminate a group
> of mailboxes to be d
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 13:13 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> I noticed when sending to multiple recipents that separating recipients
> with ';' and ',' wasn't the same. I'm using version 2.11.90
>
> When using ';' only the first recipient got the mail
> When using ',' everyone got it.
>
> Can some
I noticed when sending to multiple recipents that separating recipients
with ';' and ',' wasn't the same. I'm using version 2.11.90
When using ';' only the first recipient got the mail
When using ',' everyone got it.
Can someone reproduce this? It's clearly a bug (if I'm correct)
Regards,
Danie
