Re: [Evolution] Question about mailto URLs in emails and parsingin Evolution

2007-03-16 Thread Anders Lund
And with Evolution 2.10 this now works. Thanks to whoever fixed it! - Anders On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:43 +0100, Anders Lund wrote: > Anders Lund wrote: > > Eduardo Spremolla wrote: > >> AFAIK the parameters on a maito URL are non standard extensions, may be > >> evo steak to the standard. > > >

Re: [Evolution] Question about mailto URLs in emails and parsingin Evolution

2007-03-01 Thread Anders Lund
Anders Lund wrote: > Eduardo Spremolla wrote: >> AFAIK the parameters on a maito URL are non standard extensions, may be >> evo steak to the standard. > > Which standard is this? > > So Evolution is only picking the address part of the mailto URL, because > this is what the "standard" says? > >

Re: [Evolution] Question about mailto URLs in emails and parsingin Evolution

2007-02-25 Thread Anders Lund
Eduardo Spremolla wrote: > AFAIK the parameters on a maito URL are non standard extensions, may be > evo steak to the standard. Which standard is this? So Evolution is only picking the address part of the mailto URL, because this is what the "standard" says? RFC 2368 is giving the format of mail

Re: [Evolution] Question about mailto URLs in emails and parsingin Evolution

2007-02-23 Thread Eduardo Spremolla
AFAIK the parameters on a maito URL are non standard extensions, may be evo steak to the standard. On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 11:49 +0100, Anders Lund wrote: > Running Evolution 2.9.91 > > I have emails with mailto URLs like: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In Thunderbird this is presented as o