Re: [Evolution] Possible deletion/selection bug

2008-06-25 Thread Reid Thompson
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:24 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 15:47 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > evolution exchange via OWA > > hide deleted messages is toggled on > > > > this is svn head, for the past couple of days for me... > > I did some testing, and it does appear that for

Re: [Evolution] Possible deletion/selection bug

2008-06-25 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 15:47 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > evolution exchange via OWA > hide deleted messages is toggled on > > this is svn head, for the past couple of days for me... > I did some testing, and it does appear that for me, the next selected > email is N down the tree where N is the n

Re: [Evolution] Possible deletion/selection bug

2008-06-24 Thread Reid Thompson
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 15:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:46 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > I've noticed recently the following behavior, that I think is different > > from previous behavior and incorrect. > > > > Select multiple emails for deletion where there are

Re: [Evolution] Possible deletion/selection bug

2008-06-24 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:46 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > I've noticed recently the following behavior, that I think is different > from previous behavior and incorrect. > > Select multiple emails for deletion where there are both older and newer > emails around the selection. Delete the emails.

[Evolution] Possible deletion/selection bug

2008-06-24 Thread Reid Thompson
I've noticed recently the following behavior, that I think is different from previous behavior and incorrect. Select multiple emails for deletion where there are both older and newer emails around the selection. Delete the emails. Note that instead of just moving to the next newest email, the 'c