On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 13:03 -0400, Jim Popovitch via evolution-list
wrote:
> Hmmm, I've been using separate smtp sending accounts, but I've
> noticed that signed email (such as this one) displays uid 0
> regardless of which subkey was used. Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
Hi,
I do not thin
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:50 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> got fixed in 3.28.4.
Henceforth there should be no issues with urls that I paste, as I
upgraded to 3.28.5.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:50 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Feel free to tell your distribution to ship recent versions.
Yes, I suppose Ubuntu is a little behind Fedora!
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options o
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> A wrapped URL is _not_ an Evolution bug
Is this not the same as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7575
04
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list optio
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:47 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > A wrapped URL is _not_ an Evolution bug. It's no issue at all for
> > Evolution, but some MUAs are unable to handle it.
>
> Sent as plain text from Evolution 3.28.1-2, it appears whol
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> A wrapped URL is _not_ an Evolution bug. It's no issue at all for
> Evolution, but some MUAs are unable to handle it.
Sent as plain text from Evolution 3.28.1-2, it appears whole in the
compose window, but after sending it appears broken in
Too funny, one of the long URLs was wrapped in the editor, as well as by
the saved draft, but after sending both long URLs were unwrapped.
Evolution 3.28.5
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscr
A wrapped URL is _not_ an Evolution bug. It's no issue at all for
Evolution, but some MUAs are unable to handle it.
Both are ok when using Evolution:
https://www.google.de/search?ei=8VlxW4WbJcacsAej2qf4Ag&q=a+very+very+very+long+URL&oq=a+very+very+very+long+URL&gs_l=psy-ab.3...9023.10630.0.11143
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 10:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> BTW when posting URLs be careful about line wrapping. Recent versions
> of Evo cope with this
Yes, sorry about that. It is a bug in the version of Evolution (3.28.1-
2) that I am using. ;-(
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 11:20 +0200, Gary C Curtin wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 09:33 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Exactly. You should report this as a bug and post the URL here in case
> > anyone wants to comment.
>
> Thanks Patrick.
>
> I have submitted it at https://gitlab.gnome.org/
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 09:33 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Exactly. You should report this as a bug and post the URL here in case
> anyone wants to comment.
Thanks Patrick.
I have submitted it at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/
94
___
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 08:53 +0200, Gary C Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 23:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It's not clear from your description whether you created a separate
> > signature (PGP key pair) for the alias. If so, and that signature is
> > not being used, then it would
On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 23:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's not clear from your description whether you created a separate
> signature (PGP key pair) for the alias. If so, and that signature is
> not being used, then it would count as a bug and should be filed as
> such. Otherwise, it may
On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 09:55 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
> When PGP signing of messages by default is enabled, it seems that any
> aliases on that account are being signed using the parent account PGP
> signature. So the receiver gets a signature which is valid, just not
> for the sender's address.
>
On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 17:52 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Depends on what you think an alias is. To me an alias is an address
> that should be treated like something else. So if an address of
> f...@blogs.com is the main address and j...@blogs.com is an alias,
> then
> I would expect that if mail ar
On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 16:14 +0200, Gary C Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 09:55 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
> Any idea on how to prevent aliases taking the parent signature, but
> still have the parent account enabled for signature by default?
>
> Solved this myself by not using aliases, and s
On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 16:14 +0200, Gary C Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 09:55 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
> Any idea on how to prevent aliases taking the parent signature, but still
> have the parent account enabled for signature by default?
>
> Solved this myself by not using aliases, and
On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 09:55 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
Any idea on how to prevent aliases taking the parent signature, but still have
the parent account enabled for signature by default?
Solved this myself by not using aliases, and setting up an SMTP only
account for each address that was previous
When PGP signing of messages by default is enabled, it seems that any
aliases on that account are being signed using the parent account PGP
signature. So the receiver gets a signature which is valid, just not
for the sender's address.
Any idea on how to prevent aliases taking the parent signature,
19 matches
Mail list logo
