Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-04-02 Thread Saikat Guha
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 02:27 +0200, guenther wrote: > > 2. I read the mail on home-Evo, which then marks it as read (both > > locally, and at the server) > > This may not necessarily be true. Evolution definitely syncs back with > the IMAP server, when you're leaving a folder. Yep, I tried switchi

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-04-02 Thread guenther
> I have one IMAP server, which is accessed by two different instances of > Evolution on two separate computers (home and office). I do not close > evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all > day/all night. The problem I have is as follows: > > 1. When a new mail arriv

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-31 Thread Erik Slagter
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 02:51 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:42 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 08:39, Saikat Guha wrote: > > > The question then becomes, am I correct in concluding that Evolution > > > cannot properly sync with up with IMAP without a three

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 01:39 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 17:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 18:23 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote: > > > I do not close > > > evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all > > > day/all night. The problem I

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Saikat Guha
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:42 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 08:39, Saikat Guha wrote: > > The question then becomes, am I correct in concluding that Evolution > > cannot properly sync with up with IMAP without a three-finger salute? > > You can choose "work offline" as a substi

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 08:39, Saikat Guha wrote: > The question then becomes, am I correct in concluding that Evolution > cannot properly sync with up with IMAP without a three-finger salute? You can choose "work offline" as a substitute. Evo will still run but will be deconnected from IMAP (and co

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Saikat Guha
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 17:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 18:23 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote: > > I do not close > > evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all > > day/all night. The problem I have is as follows: > > The obvious solution is to log off whe

Re: [Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 18:23 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote: > Hi, > > I have one IMAP server, which is accessed by two different instances of > Evolution on two separate computers (home and office). I do not close > evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all > day/all night. T

[Evolution] Mulriple Evo, same IMAP, read-status sync

2006-03-30 Thread Saikat Guha
Hi, I have one IMAP server, which is accessed by two different instances of Evolution on two separate computers (home and office). I do not close evolution when I go home, or to the office and leave both running all day/all night. The problem I have is as follows: 1. When a new mail arrives, both