Hi,
Il giorno mar, 15/05/2018 alle 11.29 +0200, Milan Crha ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 10:45 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> > As far as I can understand, we don't know exactly why this
> happens,
> > do we? Should we try to find it out?
>
> Hi,
> yes, we should try to find the root cause
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 10:45 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> As far as I can understand, we don't know exactly why this happens,
> do we? Should we try to find it out?
Hi,
yes, we should try to find the root cause of this. There's a bug on the
evolution-data-server side as well.
As a guess, you
Hi Milan,
Il giorno lun, 14/05/2018 alle 10.34 +0200, Milan Crha ha scritto:
> in a different
> evolution, yours 3.26.6, then it shows no attachment icon initially,
> but as soon as I view the message for the first time the icon is
> added.
>
> It is not added when I play with internal files and
On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 12:38 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> (Sorry, but indeed I didn't know how to be not too much nor too
> little "verbose" in providing the message structure). You can find a
> more detailed structure attached.
Hi,
that's okay, neither I gave you enough instructions.
I took
Hi,
Il giorno gio, 10/05/2018 alle 18.02 +0200, Milan Crha ha scritto:
> having there also lines with the "boundary" values would make it
> clearer how the parts are interleaved,
>
> [...]
>
> Could you include in your list of headers also the boundaries,
> please?
> I'll try to construct a simil
On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 23:33 +0200, Ángel wrote:
> (andrea, could you share which one sent this email?)
Hi,
it's already written in the initial message in this thread, it was
Apple Mail.
> In which case, a better structure would have been:
Well, multipart/alternative has a meaning of "her
On 2018-05-10 at 18:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> having there also lines with the "boundary" values would make it
> clearer how the parts are interleaved, but from what I understand and
> guess, they have the message structure as:
>
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain
>
On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 13:08 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> is that enough to understand something?
Hi,
having there also lines with the "boundary" values would make it
clearer how the parts are interleaved, but from what I understand and
guess, they have the message structure as:
multipar
Hi,
Il giorno gio, 10/05/2018 alle 10.22 +0200, Milan Crha ha scritto:
>
> [...]
>
> Anyway, the message structure, it's basically about checking the
> message source and from it all headers which start with "Content-",
> like "Content-Type", "Content-Disposition" and so on.
thank you Milan,
her
On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 09:23 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> Please let me know, if I can help, what would be the best way to sort
> it out now.
Hi,
check what the message structure look like. For example encrypted
messages are hard to guess whether they contain an attachment or not,
because tho
Hi,
I have received a message with attachments, but the message list
doesn't show the clip icon.
The message is in an IMAP folder, and if I move/copy it to another
IMAP folder, the icon does not appear. On the other hand, if I
move/copy it to a local folder, the icon appears. If I copy/move it
f
11 matches
Mail list logo
