Re: [Evolution] Long standing feature request (Undo operation)

2017-05-19 Thread Pete Biggs
> > Yes, it might be a useful thing and I might use it once or twice a > > year, but I can see that to do it properly it would have to be built > > into every operation and that is a massive task and something that > > affects the whole of the gui codebase I presume - possibly even the > > other b

Re: [Evolution] Long standing feature request (Undo operation)

2017-05-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 14:30 -0400, Youssef Mahmoud wrote: > That's disappointing, but understandable. Do you think the difficulty > of implementing this is unique to Evolution's design, or is it just the > way things are in general? I only ask because of the prevalence of this > feature in other em

Re: [Evolution] Long standing feature request (Undo operation)

2017-05-19 Thread Youssef Mahmoud
Pete, > It may be 15 years old, but it's only got 31 comments on it and > there's > a massive gap of 5 years 2010-2015 with only 10 comments in the last > 10 > years. So, TBH, there doesn't really seem to be a massive clamouring > for it. Perhaps not, but there are also 6 subsequently filed bugs

Re: [Evolution] Long standing feature request (Undo operation)

2017-05-19 Thread Pete Biggs
I've added what the mysterious feature request is to the subject line since it's not mentioned anywhere ... > -Are they aware that this is a standard feature of pretty much every > other modern email client in existence, and that this request is 15 > years old now? It may be 15 years old, but i