On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 08:32 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
>
> 3. POP allows for offline access of emails (already received, of
> course), IMAP does not (but most clients will offer the option for
> local storage of email).
If you use offlineimap (great software!), you get IMAP offline anytime
you wa
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:45 +, Paul Leyland wrote:
> > Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> > need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single
> > machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages.
> > I keep my fol
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single
> machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages.
> I keep my folders quite small in size/number of messages. I have a huge
> d
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:34 -0600, Bart wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > > > Hope this is not too far off topic.
> > > > I am using pop fo
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:34:22 -0600
Bart wrote:
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my
> single machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation
> messages. I keep my folders quite s
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:34 -0600, Bart wrote:
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't
> need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single
> machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages.
> I keep my folders quite small
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > > Hope this is not too far off topic.
> > > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > Hope this is not too far off topic.
> > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
> > machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IM
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:39 +0100, randall wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > Hope this is not too far off topic.
> > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
> > machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP
> > as be
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> Hope this is not too far off topic.
> I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
> machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP
> as being just "SO" much better.
> Would someone either explain or
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote:
> Hope this is not too far off topic.
>
> I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
> machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP
> as being just "SO" much better.
>
> Would someone either expl
Hope this is not too far off topic.
I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one
machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP
as being just "SO" much better.
Would someone either explain or point me to a place where I can learn
the reasons for
12 matches
Mail list logo
