Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-17 Thread Pete Biggs
> In particular for those whose mother-tongue isn't English: The RFCs are > not distinguishing between mailbox and folder, e.g. IMAP4 clients can > create, rename, and/or delete mailboxes (usually presented to the user > as folders) on the server, and copy messages between mailboxes. Multiple > ma

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-17 Thread Tom
Am Montag, den 16.05.2016, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: > > > With a real trash the message is actually moved to the folder when it > > > is deleted and it disappears completely from the original folder. > > ^^ > > Can we be sure about that or how it's programmed ? For

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 14:45 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > The "marked as deleted" paradigm comes from the time when removing a > message from a mail folder was a very time expensive process - MBOX > was > the standard with all the messages from a folder held in one big > file. > When you want to remov

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Pete Biggs
> > With a real trash the message is actually moved to the folder when it > > is deleted and it disappears completely from the original folder. >  ^^  > Can we be sure about that or how it's programmed ? For all I know IMAP > specification has neither a MOVE nor a DELETE co

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Tom
Am Montag, den 16.05.2016, 14:45 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: > > From a users (interface) point of view, what is the (obviously annoying) > > difference between seeing trash in an evolution-created virtual folder > > or anywhere else, presuming that the "mark as deleted" method utilises > > this alt

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Pete Biggs
> From a users (interface) point of view, what is the (obviously annoying) > difference between seeing trash in an evolution-created virtual folder > or anywhere else, presuming that the "mark as deleted" method utilises > this alternative location instead ? It can't.  The whole point of the "mar

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Tom
Am Montag, den 16.05.2016, 12:33 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: (...) > > I guess you'd like to see an option for this at the Summary page of the > > new Mail account wizard, something like "Lookup special folders on the > > server" (I miss a better, user-friendly name, for it), initially > > checked,

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:59 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > I guess you'd like to see an option for this at the Summary page of > > the new Mail account wizard, something like "Lookup special folders > > on the server" (I miss a better, u

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:59 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > I guess you'd like to see an option for this at the Summary page of > the new Mail account wizard, something like "Lookup special folders > on the server" (I miss a better, user-friendly name, for it) Perhaps "Check server for Trash and Junk f

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > > Does it enable the real Trash if it finds it on the server, or does > > it just populate the field and leave the option disabled? > Hi, > enables and uses it. For newly configured accounts only, already > created accounts are left unaffected. OK. > > I guess you'd like to see an

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 11:53 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > Does it enable the real Trash if it finds it on the server, or does > it just populate the field and leave the option disabled? Hi, enables and uses it. For newly configured accounts only, already created accounts are left unaffected.

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Pete Biggs
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:38 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 16:52 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > There is no option to use a real Junk folder so > > you'll just have to put up with there being two of them. > Hi, > the IMAP in the evolution supports both real Trash and Junk

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 16:52 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > There is no option to use a real Junk folder so > you'll just have to put up with there being two of them. Hi, the IMAP in the evolution supports both real Trash and Junk folders. The 3.20.0+ also tries to detect real folders on the s

Re: [Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-14 Thread Pete Biggs
On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 17:16 +0300, Prometheus wrote: > I am on Evolution 3.18.5.1 / Debian stretch - Gnome 3.20 > > On every IMAP mail account i have i get two times a Junk and a Trash > folder. The one is local and the other is the on-line folder, apart > from my hotmail account which has only th

[Evolution] IMAP - Junk and Trash folder appear twice

2016-05-14 Thread Prometheus
I am on Evolution 3.18.5.1 / Debian stretch - Gnome 3.20 On every IMAP mail account i have i get two times a Junk and a Trash folder. The one is local and the other is the on-line folder, apart from my hotmail account which has only the two junk folders (not two trash).Is there a way to keep only