> Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't too sure the best way as its the first time.
Just had a quick look at e-p archives, didn't see posts by you there.
Please send all patches to evolution-patches [1] or discuss coding
related issues with the hackers on evolution-hackers [2]. Subscribe
first, oth
Hi Partha,
Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't too sure the best way as its the first time.
Also can someone look at the prototype for the header file as its well
over my head and I' like to move to evo 2.4.1 as I've noticed a few
weird bits running 2.4.0 with a 1.4.1.1 backend!
Pete
On 10/11/05,
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the patches. But patches should really be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks again,
Cheers,
partha
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 14:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A couple of days ago I reported that I was having problems compiling
> eds on FC4. The problem was due to F
Hi All,
A couple of days ago I reported that I was having problems compiling
eds on FC4. The problem was due to FC4's strict policy of implicit
declarations. I worked it out and here's a basic patch. Now I'm having
similar problems with evo 2.4.1 with a new function that was added to
fix bug #2644
