Re: [Evolution] live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ cyclic redirection [Was: 2.32.3 && printing]

2012-05-22 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 07:10 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > > Where is the FAQnowlocated? > > > http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ but it slowly is killed in favor of > > > http://library.gnome.org/users/evolution > > The last URL works for me while th

[Evolution] live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ cyclic redirection [Was: 2.32.3 && printing]

2012-05-22 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > > Where is the FAQnowlocated? > > http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ but it slowly is killed in favor of > > http://library.gnome.org/users/evolution > The last URL works for me while the first URL in firefox says: > The page isn't redirecting properly +1 I

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-16 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 09:00 -0300, Lailah wrote: > I use Evolution 3.2.3 in Fedora 16. In my Help's menu there's no way > to go to the documentation in Yelp. There's only 2 items: About and > Quick reference. > What happened? I packaged the documentation separately in Fedora because it's too bi

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-16 Thread Lailah
Andre: I use Evolution 3.2.3 in Fedora 16. In my Help's menu there's no way to go to the documentation in Yelp. There's only 2 items: About and Quick reference. What happened? Thanks El mié, 14-03-2012 a las 23:57 +0100, Andre Klapper escribió: > How do you search the FAQ? Text search in

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-14 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 23:36 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > I agree, but not sure if either Mallard and/or the XSLT (?) on > library.gnome.org support creating and displaying a table of contents. > > ToCs probably never got considered as I don't know any other GNOME > application with Mallard-forma

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-14 Thread Andre Klapper
re enough volunteers to maintain this. If anybody wants to make this plan reality: You can find all user docs changes in the Evolution Git code repository either by grep'ing for "User docs" or "User Docs", or by going to http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/log/help/C

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-14 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:57 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On the other hand, the generated HTML pages [1] could really use a table > of contents. I do still find the FAQ easier to search, though. There's > something to be said for having all the answers on one page. Yeah, that's the advantage o

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs

2012-03-14 Thread Andre Klapper
> > Could you elaborate a bit? On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 11:15 -0500, Dan Saint-Andre wrote: > I've been making "documentation" for decades. In days of olde, > documentation has several distinct parts: Oh whou, thanks for explaining this - I really appreciate it and it provides a "We've come a long w

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs

2012-03-14 Thread Dan Saint-Andre
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 15:31 +, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote: > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:42:59 +0100 > From: Andre Klapper > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup] > Message-ID: <

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-14 Thread Robert Seward
it, continues to improve it, and is very responsive > to bug reports. But there's room for improvement in how it's presented > on the web. > May I make a suggestion? Keep the FAQ, but when it becomes difficult to answer a particular question in a version neutral way add a li

Re: [Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-14 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 14:42 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > I'm the one to blame as I added this. IMO anything that helps the user > should be in one central place - in the user docs. I don't consider the > user docs a "reference manual" (not sure what that term means). > And I welcome patches. :) >

[Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

2012-03-14 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 07:52 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Milan, there's a warning at the top of that page to the effect that the > FAQ is no longer maintained and no material should be added to it. I > personally consider this a big mistake as in my view a FAQ and a > reference manual are tw

Re: [Evolution] FAQ

2010-06-21 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
elp > > menu, or directly at http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ > > According to http://live.gnome.org/Evolution, the most up-to-date link > for the FAQ is at > http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ. I don't see where it says that this is the most up-to-date version, but if it

Re: [Evolution] FAQ

2010-06-21 Thread Thomas Mittelstaedt
According to http://live.gnome.org/Evolution, the most up-to-date link for the FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ. -- thomas ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mai

[Evolution] FAQ

2010-06-21 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Just a heads up: some users don't seem to notice that Evo has a FAQ which answers many common questions. You can get to it via the Help menu, or directly at http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ You can also open an account and *add* stuff to the FAQ or correct any mistakes it might have. This is easy t

[Evolution] FAQ

2007-11-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
Just to remind people once again, thhere is a useful Evo FAQ at: http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ It seems to have had new material added recently, which is good. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org