Hi :)
The 12.04 LTS has 'only' 2 years official support left. However it
has had more of the equivalent of "Service Packs" so it should be a
lot smoother. By the time the official support runs out there will be
2 choices to upgrade to = the 14.04 and the 16.04, both LTSes.
If you look at the Dis
Hi :)
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS is officially supported for another 4 years, which is
a massive advantage over other distros. I hadn't thought about that
factor at all.
I think quite a lot of people upgrade to a newer version of Ubuntu
every 2 years = so jumping from 1 of their LTS releases to the next
w
Hi :)
The 12.04 LTS has 'only' 2 years official support left. However it
has had more of the equivalent of "Service Packs" so it should be a
lot smoother. By the time the official support runs out there will be
2 choices to upgrade to = the 14.04 and the 16.04, both LTSes.
If you look at the Dis
Hi :)
I think it can be upgraded but to do that you would probably need to
download Evo from the official website.
I'm not sure if it's available as a .deb for easy install so you might
have to download the source-code and build it. The upside to that is
that it would be tailored to your machine
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:38 +, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
[Please don't top-post on the list]
> I think it can be upgraded but to do that you would probably need to
> download Evo from the official website.
Evo is in synch with the version of Gnome, so updating to a radically
different versio
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 12:59 +0530, SanthanaKrishnan wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Thanks for the detailed reply to my query. I am really surprised the way
> the open source community work and the passion everyone show towards it.
>
> Lot of members from the group had helped by giving their advice. Our
>
Dear All,
Thanks for the detailed reply to my query. I am really surprised the way
the open source community work and the passion everyone show towards it.
Lot of members from the group had helped by giving their advice. Our
Software people insisted on installing UBUNTU LTS 12.0.4
So we initial
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:50 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> RHEL is not an exact match though to a Fedora version - there are
> things
> in RHEL that were never in Fedora (mainly commercial enterprise
> things)
> - and similarly, CentOS isn't an exact match to RHEL either in that
> some
> things retain
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 10:03 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 11:26 +, Tom, Yahoo wrote:
> > However, i still find it very odd that Evo people have been
> > recommending Ubuntu. So far each different person's has recommended 2
> > or 3 distros with Ubuntu being in each
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 11:26 +, Tom, Yahoo wrote:
> However, i still find it very odd that Evo people have been
> recommending Ubuntu. So far each different person's has recommended 2
> or 3 distros with Ubuntu being in each different list. Usually people
> on this mailing list seem to be qui
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 00:04 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 14:01 +, Tom, Yahoo wrote:
> > It would be MUCH better to simply upgrade to Fedora 20 or to their
> > "Rawhide" (which will probably become 21 eventually).
> As Pete says, Fedora 21 is already released. Howev
On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 14:01 +, Tom, Yahoo wrote:
> It would be MUCH better to simply upgrade to Fedora 20 or to their
> "Rawhide" (which will probably become 21 eventually).
As Pete says, Fedora 21 is already released. However I would absolutely
NOT recommend anyone other than an expert intere
>
> It would be MUCH better to simply upgrade to Fedora 20 or to their
> "Rawhide" (which will probably become 21 eventually).
No, Fedora 21 was released a month ago.
As I said before, in a production environment like an office you should
really, really be using a distro that has a long life.
Hi :)
Ubuntu is a very popular system and widely known outside in the wider
world so it might be easier for your software providers to support.
So it might well be a good choice.
However Ubuntu does have a very different Desktop Environment (=DE) so
it looks very different from what you are used t
On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 10:02 +0530, SanthanaKrishnan wrote:
> Is ubuntu the right choice
Criteria entirely depends on your needs.
Comparing and discussing (dis)advantages of distributions is out of
scope for this mailing list which is about Evolution only.
Refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C
Dear Sir,
Thanks for the feedback. My software provider tells that I update to
Ubuntu. We need to update close to 15 systems from fedora 14.
Is ubuntu the right choice as we might need to export evolution data
which is very vital to us.
Santhanakrishnan
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 15:17 +0100, Andre
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:12 +0530, SanthanaKrishnan wrote:
> The fedora version was 14
You have way bigger problems than Evolution not starting. Your entire
system is heavily outdated and full of security invulnerabilities.
I'm very reluctant to help folks if that means keeping a dangerous
system
Please, please, please don't reply to message digests - even if you edit
the digest to just show the relevant post (which you didn't) and change
the subject line, it still breaks threading. If you must use digests,
turn on mime encoded messages so that you can reply to individual
threads.
And wh
Hi,
The fedora version was 14 and evolution was 2.32.3. The version of
(lib)ical was 0.43-5.
The error message was seen when I tried to run from terminal.
Santhana Krishnan
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:00 +, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org
wrote:
> Send evolution-list mailing list submissio
19 matches
Mail list logo
