On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 13:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:57 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 09:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > (And that doesn't just go for Evo - any software that is not
> > > explicitly
> > > stated to be a stable version shoul
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:57 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 09:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > (And that doesn't just go for Evo - any software that is not
> > explicitly
> > stated to be a stable version shouldn't be used for anything that you
> > aren't willing to loose!
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 09:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> (And that doesn't just go for Evo - any software that is not
> explicitly
> stated to be a stable version shouldn't be used for anything that you
> aren't willing to loose!)
Or indeed lose (sorry :-)
poc
_
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 00:45 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 23:57 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> > I have my messages destroyed twice today. I am replying to a request for
> > comments on an e-mail with an attached document. The original e-mail also
> > contains a tra
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 23:57 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> I have my messages destroyed twice today. I am replying to a request for
> comments on an e-mail with an attached document. The original e-mail also
> contains a trademark like graphic from the sender's employer. In both
> cases, the
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 23:57 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
>
> I have my messages destroyed twice today.
One? Some? All?
> I am replying to a request for comments on an e-mail with an attached
> document. The original e-mail also contains a trademark like graphic
> from the sender's employer. I
I have my messages destroyed twice today. I am replying to a request for
comments on an e-mail with an attached document. The original e-mail also
contains a trademark like graphic from the sender's employer. In both
cases, the message simply disappeared. It is not in Trash. It is not in
