On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 17:14 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 11:26 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > there was added (in 3.13.x) an option Edit->Preferences->Composer
> > preferences->Send messages through Outbox folder, which is off by
> > default, from which I suppose you turned
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 11:26 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> there was added (in 3.13.x) an option Edit->Preferences->Composer
> preferences->Send messages through Outbox folder, which is off by
> default, from which I suppose you turned it on.
Err. Which bug report ID was that?
And where's the bug re
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 22:26 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote:
> Is this correct performance for sending e-mail.
>
> When I complete composing an e-mail and click on "Send", the message
> does not send, but goes to the Outbox. It stays in the Outbox until
> I click on "Send All."
>
> With a
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 13:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:57 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 09:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > (And that doesn't just go for Evo - any software that is not
> > > explicitly
> > > stated to be a stable version shoul
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:57 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 09:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > (And that doesn't just go for Evo - any software that is not
> > explicitly
> > stated to be a stable version shouldn't be used for anything that you
> > aren't willing to loose!
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 09:33 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> (And that doesn't just go for Evo - any software that is not
> explicitly
> stated to be a stable version shouldn't be used for anything that you
> aren't willing to loose!)
Or indeed lose (sorry :-)
poc
_
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 00:45 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 23:57 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> > I have my messages destroyed twice today. I am replying to a request for
> > comments on an e-mail with an attached document. The original e-mail also
> > contains a tra
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 23:57 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> I have my messages destroyed twice today. I am replying to a request for
> comments on an e-mail with an attached document. The original e-mail also
> contains a trademark like graphic from the sender's employer. In both
> cases, the
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 23:57 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
>
> I have my messages destroyed twice today.
One? Some? All?
> I am replying to a request for comments on an e-mail with an attached
> document. The original e-mail also contains a trademark like graphic
> from the sender's employer. I
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 05:40 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> Where are the dictionary files located in 3.13.3?
If "there is no way to add new words", feel free to file a bug report
with exact steps (click by click, preferably leaving no room for
interpretation) under
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/ente
I have my messages destroyed twice today. I am replying to a request for
comments on an e-mail with an attached document. The original e-mail also
contains a trademark like graphic from the sender's employer. In both
cases, the message simply disappeared. It is not in Trash. It is not in
Where are the dictionary files located in 3.13.3? When I attempt to
correct misspelled words (red underline), I am given choices; but if the
word is not in the dictionaries (English, American English) there is no
way to add new words. I could do this with the earlier version of
Evolution I wa
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 22:26 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote:
> Is this correct performance for sending e-mail.
>
> When I complete composing an e-mail and click on "Send", the message does
> not send, but goes to the Outbox. It stays in the Outbox until I click on
> "Send All."
>
> With
Is this correct performance for sending e-mail.
When I complete composing an e-mail and click on "Send", the message does
not send, but goes to the Outbox. It stays in the Outbox until I click on
"Send All."
With an earlier edition of Evolution, the message was sent automatically
without n
I too am using 3.13.3 under Ubuntu 14.04 64-bit running on a DELL Vostro 3500
with 8 GB ram. Only problems so far is that sending HTML e-mails of several
paragraphs sometimes results in slow "send" with excessive CPU usage (Intel
i5 with 4 CPUs).
One annoying feature is the spell check. Right cl
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> .
>
> A note to the OP: On mailing lists usually plain text, inline or
> bottom posting is wanted. HTML and top posting are frowned upon, if
> not forbidden. Btw. it's better to use plain text even for private
> and business mails, even
PS: The endless lines aren't endless (anymore) and I was mistaken, they
even were not endless in my Evo's editor, I'm not used to HTML without
line breaking, just the OP's line really is endless, IOW scrolling from
left to right is needed.
___
evolution-
Hi,
there's a reason why I reply using HTML ;).
I guess it's not the fault of the OP, but likely an Evolution bug. One
of the HTML lines is endless:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 08:25 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> 3.13 seems to have some formatting "quirkiness" that makes me a little
> uncomfortable. Per
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 08:25 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> Please, will someone point me to a 3.12.*.deb file. I can't seem to
> find it anywhere.
https://packages.debian.org/sid/evolution
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
__
n't seem to
find it anywhere.
Dave W
-Original Message-
From: Milan Crha
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.13.3
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:02:03 +0200
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Downgrading is always unsupported
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Downgrading is always unsupported and at your own risk, but at this
> time I believe downgrading from 3.13 to 3.12 *should* be relatively
> safe.
>
Hi,
you are right with the both parts here. Downgrading is unsupported,
but i
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:21 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> > I know 3.13.* is still in development but it seems to work okay
> > nevertheless. My main problem is the font size on the compose mail
> > screen. I seems stuck on a small font desp
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:21 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> I know 3.13.* is still in development but it seems to work okay
> nevertheless. My main problem is the font size on the compose mail
> screen. I seems stuck on a small font despite my attempts to change
> that in "preferences". So I have a f
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:21 +1000, Wasserland wrote:
> I am new to this list . . .
>
>
> I am using Ubuntu 14.04. I decided to install 3.13.3 because I was
> having trouble with Ubuntu's the default version of Evolution. ie
> Couldn't get Junk/Spamassassin working.
>
>
> I know 3.13.* is st
I am new to this list . . .
I am using Ubuntu 14.04. I decided to install 3.13.3 because I was
having trouble with Ubuntu's the default version of Evolution. ie
Couldn't get Junk/Spamassassin working.
I know 3.13.* is still in development but it seems to work okay
nevertheless. My main
25 matches
Mail list logo
