Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.28.0 namespace

2010-03-08 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Jungowski wrote: > Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 21:28 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: > > This is not a problem with Evo but with the way Cyrus works by default. > > You need to configure it to use the "anonymous root" folder layout > > instead of the def

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.28.0 namespace

2010-03-08 Thread Martin Jungowski
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 21:28 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: > This is not a problem with Evo but with the way Cyrus works by default. > You need to configure it to use the "anonymous root" folder layout > instead of the default "INBOX root" which is uses out of the box. I > forget the name

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.28.0 namespace

2010-03-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 10:52 +0100, Martin Jungowski wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm evaluating Evolution to switch our company over from Thunderbird and > have run into a weird namespace issue. I have two mailservers > configured, a Kerio Connect 7 Groupware-Server and a Cyrus IMAP server. > The fo

[Evolution] Evolution 2.28.0 namespace

2010-03-06 Thread Martin Jungowski
Hi everybody, I'm evaluating Evolution to switch our company over from Thunderbird and have run into a weird namespace issue. I have two mailservers configured, a Kerio Connect 7 Groupware-Server and a Cyrus IMAP server. The folder list for these two looks as follows: Kerio: [-] INBOX [-] db [-]