Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-09 Thread Scott Anderson
James: I got it from Debian using unstable. I also have rebuilt the package to enable debugging. Scott --- James Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott, > > Where did you get Evolution 2.4.2.1? Is it available somewhere as a RPM > or SRPM? > > Thanks, > > > On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 22

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-08 Thread James Richardson
Scott, Where did you get Evolution 2.4.2.1? Is it available somewhere as a RPM or SRPM? Thanks, On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 22:32 -0800, Scott Anderson wrote: > I'm using evolution 2.4.2.1 with GW7. I does have some limitations, but for > the most part it is > very useable. Here's my list of works

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-07 Thread James Richardson
Harish, Thanks for the quick reply! I've love to get both 2.4.2 and the 2.5.x RPMs. If I could get binary RPMS for SuSE10 and the SRPM, I could also try to build it for NLD9. Thanks a lot, -- === James T. Richardson, Jr. eXcellence in IS Solutions, Inc. [EMAI

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-06 Thread James Richardson
Harish, Thanks for the quick reply! I've love to get both 2.4.2 and the 2.5.x RPMs. If I could get binary RPMS for SuSE10 and the SRPM, I could also try to build it for NLD9. I tried to e-mail you off-list but a novell mail server bounced the saying my mailserver was an open relay. Which is int

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-06 Thread James Richardson
This is very good news, are RPMs of 2.4.2.x publically available? If so, for what distributions (I'm primarily concerned with NL9 and SuSE10)? Thanks! On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 22:32 -0800, Scott Anderson wrote: > I'm using evolution 2.4.2.1 with GW7. I does have some limitations, but for > the mo

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-05 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 22:32 -0800, Scott Anderson wrote: > Does not work: > > Mailer does not update sent mail folder This has been fixed in the current version. 2.6 has all this working. There are certain ABI breaks and thats the reason the fixes have not been backported to the 2.4.x branch. Ch

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-04 Thread Scott Anderson
I'm using evolution 2.4.2.1 with GW7. I does have some limitations, but for the most part it is very useable. Here's my list of works, does not work: Works: Mailer checks mail, notification pops up Correctly scans all GW folders Correctly scans for junk mail Correctly applies filters Contacts

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-04 Thread Andre Klapper
hi, Am Samstag, den 04.02.2006, 11:28 +0530 schrieb Harish Krishnaswamy: > I strongly recommend you to upgrade to Evolution 2.4.2 which has a huge > number of issues fixed on top of Evolution 2.4.0. i even more recommend to upgrade to 2.4.2.1 instead of 2.4.2. :-) cheers, andre -- mailto:[EMA

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-03 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
hi James, On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 20:49 -0600, James Richardson wrote: > Is anyone successfully using Evolution 2.4 with a Groupwise 7 server? Yes. Evolution 2.4 with GroupWise 7 has been internally deployed in Novell and has been in use for nearly 4 months now. This has also been rigorously QA

[Evolution] Evolution + GW7

2006-02-03 Thread James Richardson
Hi all, Is anyone successfully using Evolution 2.4 with a Groupwise 7 server? I'm using Evolution 2.4.0 with SuSE 10 and have found a lot of instablity/crashes and a lot of things that "just don't work". Is it even worth my time trying to get? I love Evolution as a client and would rather use it