On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:56 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:53 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
:
> > > > 1) Why must we be
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:56 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:53 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
:
> > > > 1) Why must we be
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:53 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > Ok all,
> > >
> > > I'm cross posting this to both Evolution and MailScanner because I can
> > > alre
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:44 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Ok all,
> >
> > I'm cross posting this to both Evolution and MailScanner because I can
> > already predict the finger pointing that's naturally going to result.
> >
>
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Ok all,
>
> I'm cross posting this to both Evolution and MailScanner because I can
> already predict the finger pointing that's naturally going to result.
>
> A few months ago, someone brought it to my attention that my G
Ok all,
I'm cross posting this to both Evolution and MailScanner because I can
already predict the finger pointing that's naturally going to result.
A few months ago, someone brought it to my attention that my GPG
signatures (messages signed only, not encrypted) where suddenly tur
