On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 20:35 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 19:37 -0400, Swarup wrote:
> > Ubuntu is coming out with a new LTS version in April: is there a
> > likelihood the Evo that will come with or be available to that new LTS
> > version will be able to manage HTML? If the
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 19:37 -0400, Swarup wrote:
> Ubuntu is coming out with a new LTS version in April: is there a
> likelihood the Evo that will come with or be available to that new LTS
> version will be able to manage HTML? If there is no plan to make Evo
> HTML-compatible i.e. for sending HTML
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 19:37 -0400, Swarup wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 22:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > If you need HTML, then Evolution isn't the best choice. I experienced
> > that even when formatting a HTML message with Evolution's own editor the
> > send messages can look different to th
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 22:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If you need HTML, then Evolution isn't the best choice. I experienced
> that even when formatting a HTML message with Evolution's own editor the
> send messages can look different to the edited message already by the
> sending Evolution. Fort
If you need HTML, then Evolution isn't the best choice. I experienced
that even when formatting a HTML message with Evolution's own editor the
send messages can look different to the edited message already by the
sending Evolution. Fortunately I need HTML only to make a joke from time
to time, when
I am using Evolution 2.26.1, and had reported to this forum a few months
ago that I was facing a lot of formatting problems in HTML. Any time I
would take a ready document from my word processor and paste it into evo
HTML, all the spacing and formatting would be way off.
For example headings whic
