Hi Pascal, others,
I had exactly the same symptoms as you after moving to gnome-3 (I do use
gnome-shell) including an upgrade of evolution.
Also got messages saying evolution was offline, suspected networkmanager
(because that is now less used), and just waited a lot because the silly
cancel butt
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:01 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > I followed instructions from [1] and setup my evolution to talk to
> > > Yahoo! with IMAP (not IMAP+) in 3.5.1 and it works. I also instruct
> > > the sending part to require authentication and filled there the same
> > > u...@ymail.com use
> > I followed instructions from [1] and setup my evolution to talk to
> > Yahoo! with IMAP (not IMAP+) in 3.5.1 and it works. I also instruct
> > the sending part to require authentication and filled there the same
> > u...@ymail.com user name. With that evolution works for me. Of course,
> > I'v
Am 15.05.2012 12:24, schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 20:46 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
>> To me it looks like Evolution and Yahoo-Mail do not get along very
>> well.
>
> Hi,
> I followed instructions from [1] and setup my evolution to talk to
> Yahoo! with IMAP (not IMAP+) in
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 20:46 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> To me it looks like Evolution and Yahoo-Mail do not get along very
> well.
Hi,
I followed instructions from [1] and setup my evolution to talk to
Yahoo! with IMAP (not IMAP+) in 3.5.1 and it works. I also instruct
the sending part
John:
I have 2 Yahoo Argentina accounts and 1 Yahoo España
account, both free and both POP3. I guess there's differences between
countries.
Regards,
Lailah
El jue, 10-05-2012 a las 17:29 -0400, John A. Sullivan III escribió:
>
> By the way, how does one use Evolution to access
Usually I solve this kind of issue setting the "Network Preferences"
(of Evolution) to "Directly connect to Internet".
Hope this helps,
Lailah
El vie, 11-05-2012 a las 07:29 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan escribió:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
Am 13.05.2012 14:57, schrieb Thomas Prost:
> I don't have it all in mind, but remember that at the very beginning of
> the thread, someone asked, if the errors were reproducible with
> Thunderbird. Did you check that meanwhile ?
> Couldn't yet find that in the archive ...
> --
> Best,
> Thomas
T
Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2012, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Thomas Prost:
> I don't have it all in mind, but remember that at the very beginning of
> the thread, someone asked, if the errors were reproducible with
> Thunderbird. Did you check that meanwhile ?
> Couldn't yet find that in the archive ...
> --
>
I don't have it all in mind, but remember that at the very beginning of
the thread, someone asked, if the errors were reproducible with
Thunderbird. Did you check that meanwhile ?
Couldn't yet find that in the archive ...
--
Best,
Thomas
Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2012, 14:14 +0200 schrieb Pascal Bern
Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2012, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Thomas Prost:
> ... don't see evolutuion's default settings here, but possible errors to
> be made seemed to me:
>
> [] In ALLen Ordnern nach neuen E-Mails sehen
> [X] In ABOnnierten Ordnern nach neuen E-Mails sehen
> [X] Nur ABOnnierte Ordner anzeig
... don't see evolutuion's default settings here, but possible errors to
be made seemed to me:
[] In ALLen Ordnern nach neuen E-Mails sehen
[X] In ABOnnierten Ordnern nach neuen E-Mails sehen
[X] Nur ABOnnierte Ordner anzeigen
Da mag auch noch die ein oder andere alte Übersetzung bei mir (2.32)
e
Am Freitag, den 11.05.2012, 16:17 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 14:55 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> > OK, I'll look into the NM settings then. Still I do not understand, why
> > Evo works with some mail accounts but not with others. It seems to me
> > that it has a problem wit
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 14:55 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> OK, I'll look into the NM settings then. Still I do not understand, why
> Evo works with some mail accounts but not with others. It seems to me
> that it has a problem with certain mail servers.
Hi,
yes, it seems like it's having
Am 11.05.2012 13:59, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
>> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
>> (Wheezy) made the new versio
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
> (Wheezy) made the new version of Evolution unusable as would refuse to
> download new
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
> (Wheezy) made the new version of Evolution unusable as would refuse to
> download new
Am 11.05.2012 10:26, schrieb Pete Biggs:
>
>>> Who tells that, and where?
>>
>> Right above the message list, there appears a quite huge field either in
>> red (most of the times) or in orange. It informs me that an error
>> occured and that Evolution was not able to retrieve new mails (or
>> di
> > Who tells that, and where?
>
> Right above the message list, there appears a quite huge field either in
> red (most of the times) or in orange. It informs me that an error
> occured and that Evolution was not able to retrieve new mails (or
> display the contents of a mail folder when I switch
Am 11.05.2012 00:07, schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
>> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
>> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
>> (Wheezy) made the new version of Evolution un
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 01:37 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
>
>
> > Who tells that, and where?
>
> Right above the message list, there appears a quite huge field either in
> red (most of the times) or in orange. It informs me that an error
> occured and that Evolution was not able to retrieve new
Am 10.05.2012 23:55, schrieb Andre Klapper:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
>> Now have Evo 3.2.2 and although it is in online-mode
>
> That means in the bottom left corner the two cables are connected?
Yes, they are connected.
>
>> & I have an internet connectio
Am 10.05.2012 23:29, schrieb John A. Sullivan III:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
>> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
>> (Wheezy) made the new versi
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
> (Wheezy) made the new version of Evolution unusable as would refuse to
> download new messages tellin
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> Now have Evo 3.2.2 and although it is in online-mode
That means in the bottom left corner the two cables are connected?
> & I have an internet connection, I get told that Evolution is offline
Who tells that, and where?
> and
> there
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:24 +0200, Pascal Bernhard wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
> application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
> (Wheezy) made the new version of Evolution unusable as would refuse to
> download new
Hey guys,
I decided to give Evolution another try (It was my favorite mail
application for Linux) after the switch to GNOME 3 by Debian Testing
(Wheezy) made the new version of Evolution unusable as would refuse to
download new messages telling me it had problems with connecting to the
mail server
27 matches
Mail list logo
