Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 11:38 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > For spam that is coming from a known source of spam of course. Reject > it at the SMTP envelope, sure. But not all spam comes from known > sources of spam in which case you have receive the entire DATA before > you can call it spam. At

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 11:38 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 15:31 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is enti

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 15:31 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely suboptimal, because > > > any well-run server will be doing it

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 15:31 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely suboptimal, because > > > any well-run server will be doing it

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread Erik Slagter
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:55 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely suboptimal, because > > any well-run server will be doing it server-side. > > Indeed. _Determining_ junk belongs on the s

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > All this 'Junk' stuff on the client side is entirely suboptimal, because > any well-run server will be doing it server-side. Indeed. _Determining_ junk belongs on the server. Disposition of Junk belongs on the client though. > Filterin

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 01:51 -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > > I have an IMAP account configured, and there's the automatic "Junk" > > folder showing there. Is there a way to disable it? > > See bug #253110 and the patch attached to it. >

Re: [Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 01:51 -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > I have an IMAP account configured, and there's the automatic "Junk" > folder showing there. Is there a way to disable it? See bug #253110 and the patch attached to it. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253110 http://bugzilla.gnome

[Evolution] Disabling Junk "vFolder"

2006-04-04 Thread Richard Laager
I have an IMAP account configured, and there's the automatic "Junk" folder showing there. Is there a way to disable it? Alternatively, is there a way to setup something such that things which are in my server-side "Junk Mail" folder get marked as "Junk" in Evolution? It seems filters are only appl