On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 20:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> That's more of an Evolution thing than an EDS thing, which means I
> don't necessarily already have anything in Pidgin to support it.
Hi,
only to clarify, I didn't mean that you have it in pidgin already, I
rather meant that pidgi
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Pidgin already depends on eds, if it would be easier, then write the
> evolution module in the Pidgin code base.
>
> The main question is what you'd like to achieve. Either you want to
> give users a chance to edit what they schedule with,
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:50 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > I'd be interested to see examples of this, other than people posting
> > > questions *without* being on the list, but generally those who do so
> > > are careful to mention it and ask for personal replies.
> >
> > The page I linke
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:26 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> >
> > Oh you really have. I've referred you to that same document before, I'm
> > sure :)
> No, it was me you had that argument with many years ago - hence the
> mention of me in that document and an explanation of how I do
> everything
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:20 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 17:23 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I don't understand that. I have Evolution filters to sort list traffic
> > into folders, and the folder list will show me a count of unread
> > messages.
>
> I do that too
>
> Oh you really have. I've referred you to that same document before, I'm
> sure :)
No, it was me you had that argument with many years ago - hence the
mention of me in that document and an explanation of how I do
everything wrong and how I needed to be told how to set my filters up
"correctly
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 17:23 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I don't understand that. I have Evolution filters to sort list traffic
> into folders, and the folder list will show me a count of unread
> messages.
I do that too. In 138 mailing list folders there are 688,252 unread
mails. Plus the
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 12:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Do you think it makes most sense to add a command-line option for it,
> or attempt to use an EPlugin?
Hi,
the plugin, or better module these days, gives you more freedom, you
can do many more things and fine-grain the output when
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 16:50 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 16:36 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 14:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > I am aware that you are one of the former group, and you don't want to
> > > fix your filters so that they ma
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 16:36 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 14:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I am aware that you are one of the former group, and you don't want to
> > fix your filters so that they match your preferred use case for some
> > reason. IIRC I never did
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 14:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I am aware that you are one of the former group, and you don't want to
> fix your filters so that they match your preferred use case for some
> reason. IIRC I never did work out why you think this peculiarity of
> yours is more important,
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 12:32 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 12:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the response (although yes, it really did take me this long
> > to notice it when you didn't actually send it to me).
>
> You posted your question to the lis
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 12:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Thanks for the response (although yes, it really did take me this long
> to notice it when you didn't actually send it to me).
You posted your question to the list and Milan replied to the list. Why
would you expect him to reply to you di
On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 17:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 10:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > A separate program can invoke Evolution to send an email, by
> > running
> >
> > evolution mailto:some...@example.com?subject=blah...
> >
> > Is there a way to open and pr
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 10:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> A separate program can invoke Evolution to send an email, by running
>
> evolution mailto:some...@example.com?subject=blah...
>
> Is there a way to open and pre-populate a new meeting invitation, the
> same way? I'd like to put in
A separate program can invoke Evolution to send an email, by running
evolution mailto:some...@example.com?subject=blah...
Is there a way to open and pre-populate a new meeting invitation, the
same way? I'd like to put in the initial recipients and meeting
information, then let the user fi
16 matches
Mail list logo
