G.W. Haywood wrote:
> One of the responses to my earlier comments was that if the thread is
> broken he would consider ignoring it.
After you stated that since you failed to see any problem, and thus you
didn't want to fix anything.
It *is* your problem if you express so badly that fail to be un
Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> evo still knows it, either right-click or the attachment button has
> the option to reply to the list, but it requests multipart/digest, or
> simply have each message in a separate "attachment". The default
> option of the mailman is to use multipart/digest, as
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 17:59 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> There was certainly talk of such an option being in the
> right-click menu. Is it something that has fallen by the wayside?
> Is it only possible with MIME formatted digests?
>
Hi,
evo still knows it, either right-click or the attac
> My sig follows after a
> double hyphen and is less than four lines.
err, it should be "-- " - the space is important.
> This list is like a pit full of vipers.
This list is actually quite a peaceful one - I've seen (and been bitten
by) lists a lot more caustic to people than this.
> Flame
Hi there,
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Paul Menzel wrote:
It?d be great if you followed the netiquette! ...
I've read Mr. Raymond, thank you, and it'd be great if people didn't
make unjustified and incorrect assumptions. As you have seen I keep
the subject line intact. I properly trim and quote. T
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 14:11 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Alpine is doing the right thing and uses the messages IDs from the
> *digest* message. But that is the *incorrect* message to reply to.
I don't receive the Evo digest, but I remember that mailman digest's
lists all mails in one mail's body. O
Dear G. W.,
Am Samstag, den 25.10.2014, 11:59 +0100 schrieb G.W. Haywood:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > If you break threading ...
>
> Nabble manages to follow the threads, why can't your mail client?
>
> http://gnome-evolution-general.1774414.n4.nabble.com/Restoring
Am Samstag, den 25.10.2014, 13:23 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
[…]
> Actually at least this last mail from you shows
>
> In-Reply-To:
> References:
>
> But when sorting by thread, there's no related mail.
>
> If I sort by subject, I just see one other mail with the same subject
> and also no
