On 2012-08-29, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
>> > Yes, and why this whole notion of hidden and revolving and multiple
>> > addresses is just stupid;
>> Certainly not. The rule of least privilege is state of the art. The
>> philosophy is held in high regard by everyone sufficiently
>> knowledgeabl
On 2012-08-27, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> Yes, and why this whole notion of hidden and revolving and multiple
> addresses is just stupid;
Certainly not. The rule of least privilege is state of the art. The
philosophy is held in high regard by everyone sufficiently
knowledgeable about networ
On 2012-08-27, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Paul's unattended mail
> wrote:
>> The new address should not be given to anyone.
>
> While I understand what you meant, that would kind of defeat the
> purpose of email, no? =p
It's about fin
On 2012-08-25, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> Changing your address is *NOT* a solution. There are SPAM and junk
> mail management tools. =20
I would say it is an *incomplete* solution, but certainly part of the
solution. Of course, once an email address becomes contaminated with
profuse spam, i
On 2012-07-17, Nick Jenkins wrote:
>> Then create a text file named "outlook_idiot_lecture.msg",
>> containing the following:
>>
> I'm a bit unsure that the lecture is going to change anything.
One such message probably won't, but it's like voting. If an
outlook-hostile reply comes from two dif
I've only got about 4 or 5 simple filtering rules, and Evolution can't
handle it. In short, the rules look like this:
1) pipe all messages to procmail script unconditionally, and colorize them
2) delete if condition 1 met
3) delete if condition 2 met
4) delete if condition 3 met
5) move all messa
On 2012-07-13, SanthanaKrishnan wrote:
> Fedora 16 and Evolution 3.2.1
>
> For viewing winmail.dat attachments I have "Extract TNEF archive" which
> extracts the archive and stores it in ./cache/evolution/tmp. Every time
> I have to open the folder to view the extracted files.
>
> Isn't there a ea
On 2012-07-10, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> the code [1] suggests it's intentional, once you use a move,
> the filtering is stopped automatically.
That is a very important piece of information. How misleading the app
is. The action should be renamed as "move AND stop processing".
Anyway..
So I have v
On 2012-07-03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> There is, though I can't put my finger on it in the docs. Do the
> following from a shell:
>
> $ gconftool-2 -s /apps/evolution/mail/filters/log true
> $ gconftool-2 -s /apps/evolution/mail/filters/logfile "my-Evo-filter-log"
>
> You may have to restar
On 2012-06-30, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> You could set the tag "processed" in the first filter instead of
> moving the message somewhere. In the second filter you check in the
> condition if the tag "processed" ist set and those other conditions
> are met.
Are you saying that filters can onl
On 2012-06-30, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> You could set the tag "processed" in the first filter instead of
> moving the message somewhere. In the second filter you check in the
> condition if the tag "processed" ist set and those other conditions
> are met.
Doesn't work.
Although I could not
11 matches
Mail list logo
