Re: [Evolution] I guess I am going to have to change my e-maill address.

2012-08-26 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Paul's unattended mail wrote: > The new address should not be given to anyone. While I understand what you meant, that would kind of defeat the purpose of email, no? =p ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gno

Re: [Evolution] An interesting problem

2012-06-22 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: > >> > >> With further investigation, the problem does indeed seem to be in the >> file.  If I copy the file to another directory, it gets bigger by about >> a meg.  I can attach that copy to a message without problems whereas the >> original will

Re: [Evolution] Please Inform Me When a Stable version is available for Vista

2011-10-06 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Oct 7, 2011 7:04 AM, "Fred Kauffman" wrote: > > I have not been successful to my satisfaction in utilizing Evolution. It keeps freezing or gives me error messages that servers have stopped working. I will continue using Outlook 2002 until you notify me that Evolution will be stable on my Vista

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-09-01 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Tom Davies wrote: > > > > > - Original Message ---- >> From: Oon-Ee Ng >> To: Milan Crha >> Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org >> Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 10:12:38 >> Subject: Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-08-29 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:18 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >>>> I'm finally getting back to this after a

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-08-25 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:18 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >>> I'm finally getting back to this after a hectic couple of months. >>> Still happening here, but now

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-08-25 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:18 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> I'm finally getting back to this after a hectic couple of months. >> Still happening here, but now I have more time to deal with it (I've >> just been gett

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-08-24 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Milan Crha wrote: >> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 09:23 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >>> > Having done so, I have this result - http://pastebin.com/Ci8Tqh9u >>> > >>> > Does it

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-06-06 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 09:23 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> > Having done so, I have this result - http://pastebin.com/Ci8Tqh9u >> > >> > Does it look like a proper trace? I still see lots of '??', but mainly

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-06-03 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 05:35 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >>> http://pastebin.com/Fi3ynXBs - the pastebin of gdb output. Seems to >>> have something to do with gtk o

Re: [Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-05-29 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 05:35 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> http://pastebin.com/Fi3ynXBs - the pastebin of gdb output. Seems to >> have something to do with gtk or icons. Anyone can help me obtain more >> debugging info o

[Evolution] Segfaulting after random amounts of time - evo 3.0.2

2011-05-29 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
http://pastebin.com/Fi3ynXBs - the pastebin of gdb output. Seems to have something to do with gtk or icons. Anyone can help me obtain more debugging info or figure out where to look? ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your

Re: [Evolution] Google Contacts duplicated?

2011-05-18 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 17:45 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> Additional info: when I try to remove the duplicates and delete the >> contacts which do not have the additional information, it errors out >> with 'contact not

Re: [Evolution] Google Contacts duplicated?

2011-05-18 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
es both in evolution and in google contacts. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > Hi, I've not used the google contacts feature before, the last time I > tried it last year it didn't support birthdays so was a no go. I > settled on mobical.net (now everdroid.com

[Evolution] Google Contacts duplicated?

2011-05-18 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Hi, I've not used the google contacts feature before, the last time I tried it last year it didn't support birthdays so was a no go. I settled on mobical.net (now everdroid.com) and syncevolution to get my contacts synced to Google Contacts. I just tried Evo's google contact sync again, and this t

Re: [Evolution] Current status of palmos sync?

2011-05-05 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 15:59 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> Hi, I'd like to ask whether anything has changed with the palm-pilot >> conduits for evolution 3.0.1. Specifically whether birthdays are >> synced now (they w

[Evolution] Current status of palmos sync?

2011-05-05 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Hi, I'd like to ask whether anything has changed with the palm-pilot conduits for evolution 3.0.1. Specifically whether birthdays are synced now (they weren't a while back, hence I'm now using a very roundabout syncml based way). ___ evolution-list mailin

[Evolution] Evolution 3.0.0 segfault when viewing calendars/tasks

2011-04-15 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=117004 Is anyone else experiencing this? dmesg gives this sort of messages:- Apr 15 13:03:24 localhost kernel: evolution[4366]: segfault at 50 ip 7fef9e5a70b5 sp 7fffcbf16550 error 4 in libetable.so.0.0.0[7fef9e538000+8f000] _

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0 - able to use gtk2 colour scheme?

2011-04-15 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 23:24 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> Was afraid such would be the answer. Has anyone actually tried direct >> conversion of themes? I'd think it'd just be a matter of remapping? > > No ide

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0 - able to use gtk2 colour scheme?

2011-04-10 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 16:58 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> So a pretty dumb question, anyway to make Evo 3.0 use a gtk2 theme? > > gtk3 themes use a form of CSS (gtk.css).  gtk2 themes use a completely > different, more a

[Evolution] Evolution 3.0 - able to use gtk2 colour scheme?

2011-04-10 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Hi all, a bit of a tangential question. Evolution 3.0 has been released with corresponding gtk3 dependencies. Unfortunately this means its theme rather sucks, since they're very few gtk3 themes about currently (and no dark ones). When I quit evo 3.0, however, it temporarily for a split second shows

Re: [Evolution] Shared contact info between Android/Google contacts and Evolution

2011-04-06 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Nick Jenkins wrote: > >> Also, take a look at syncevolution + mobical. > > Thank you for the heads up! Experience has just made me a bit wary of > relying on a SyncML server. For example, I thought ScheduleWorld was > great, then a month after I set everything up to

Re: [Evolution] Shared contact info between Android/Google contacts and Evolution

2011-04-05 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 18:53 +1000, Nick Jenkins wrote: >> * Some contact properties are not editable in Evo, but they seem to be >> available/supported in Google contacts. >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625330 mentions notes and >>