ement
> request? Report the BZ number here so others can chime in.
Done.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
--
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
SE has very easy mechanism
for that (one-click).
Ironically though, 2.29 is not yet a package on the system so I guess my
advocacy is self-defeating. :| Should be available in a few days though.
--
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:02 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:29 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > In every programming language I've used, plus things like OpenOffice
> > mentioned above, the number of formatting options for dates and times
> > is mind
Evolution should use the same formaters which are more
than likely part of some standard C library.
As a side note, it also includes "%x" which falls back to the localized
date format, probably a wise default for Evolution.
--
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
estion but does not create a
table.
--
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
he selected account has no "sending" method
configured, use the default account for sending/delivery.
I'm sure you well understand that but I just wanted to mention it so it
didn't get forgotten.
BTW, are you going to reopen 524497 or create a new one or ? I was
going to put these comments there as well.
Regards,
--
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:25 -0600, John Lange wrote:
>> But, suffice to say this change doesn't make much sense. I'm trying to
>> think of a situation where, by default you would want to reply from a
>
ress that the mail was sent to
(though you have to set it up).
Anyhow, when I get to a computer where I can read bugzilla I'll chime
in on this one and hopefully it gets fixed.
John
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:05 -0600, John Lange wrot
Evolution, the reply "from" address is always
set to whichever mail account received the email regardless of the "to"
address.
Is there a setting that controls that behaviour? I'm probably not using
the right search terms so my google turns up a lot of auto-responder
stuff bu
