Preferences,
Mail Accounts and disable one or more, bringing the total number below
a threshold.
I tried to run with CAMEL_DEBUG=all, CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx. Did not see
anything useful to explain startup problems.
Any suggestions?
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 09:40 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> On 10/0
I wish I knew where to look for it. Do you have any ideas?
Eugene.
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 21:53 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> > The dialog means that evolution somehow triggers wine libraries
> > use. My
> > que
; On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:30 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> > I noticed that every time evolution is launched after wine update I
> >
> > see a dialog box "updating wine configuration".
> >
> > What does evolution have to do with wine?
>
> Feel free
I noticed that every time evolution is launched after wine update I see
a dialog box "updating wine configuration".
What does evolution have to do with wine?
Eugene.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or
Clarification:
DNS server is hosted on the same test system as evolution client - DNS
updates are instantaneous.
The expected behavior is to re-query DNS record when connection timeout
occurred instead of blindly and indefinitely try the same IP address.
Eugene.
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:24 +01
d out".
Eugene.
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 15:36 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 11:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 11:52 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> > > This is "official" Fedora copr, the same code base is supposedly
> >
On 10/09/2014 11:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 11:52 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
This is "official" Fedora copr, the same code base is supposedly
targeted for Fedora 21.
Please give the URL of the repo you are using.
poc
# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/rhug
On 10/09/2014 11:17 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 09:43 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
On 10/09/2014 02:49 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
What is the server you are connecting too?
I am connecting to a corporate modified zimbra server. 3.10.x from main
Fedora 20 does not exhibit any
On 10/09/2014 02:49 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
What is the server you are connecting too?
I am connecting to a corporate modified zimbra server. 3.10.x from main
Fedora 20 does not exhibit any problems.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.
On 10/09/2014 02:51 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2014, 23:25 -0400 schrieb Eugene Kanter:
Every time I start my 3.12.5 (Fedora 20 copr repository) "Refreshing
folder.." status messages with animated foot stay indefinitely.
What accounts do you have? What provider
Every time I start my 3.12.5 (Fedora 20 copr repository) "Refreshing
folder.." status messages with animated foot stay indefinitely.
The workaround is to select File->Work Offline, kill evolution process
(it does not exit upon File->Exit) by sending two kill signals in a row,
restart evolution and
This error message The reported error was "Error syncing changes:
Invalid flag specified" is not in
CAMEL_DEBUG=all evolution
output.
Any other debug options?
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:44 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> Answering your question - it isn't
After upgrading to 3.12.5 from Fedora 20 copr repository a connection to
one of IMAP servers always results in error, shown above message list:
Failed to refresh folder "INBOX",
The reported error was "Error syncing changes: Invalid flag specified
".
Syntax of the message preserved, quote
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 20:49 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 13:24 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> > Running latest 3.12.4 from Fedora copr repository
> > "Copr repo for f20-gnome-3-12 owned by rhughes"
> >
> > File->Work Offline.
Running latest 3.12.4 from Fedora copr repository
"Copr repo for f20-gnome-3-12 owned by rhughes"
File->Work Offline.
12 hours later status bar shows:
Disconnecting from 'myusername @ mydomainname.com' (with animated gnome
foot image).
This is just one example of frequent indefinite timeouts.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702703
Almost a year later, are there any plans to address the problem?
I am tired of applying my dirty patch every time a new
evolution-data-server package comes out.
Eugene.
___
evolution-list mailing list
On 06/12/2014 01:22 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:57 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
3.12 is already available for the current Fedora:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/
This is not an official
Is there a plan to backport this to current Fedora?
On 06/12/2014 10:48 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:27 -0400, Eugene Kanter wrote:
Any ideas how to debug this anomaly?
evolution-3.10.4-2.fc20.x86_64
Might be https://bugzilla.gnome.org/724909, fixed in 3.12
Recently I noticed that I am unable to open messages with attached xml
files. UI completely freezes.
"Retrieving message" is displayed in status bar. Process "evolution"
does not respond to SIGINT.
Strace shows some threads are active, but not much activity overall,
mostly poll().
Watching for s
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 14:47 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 19:27 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I've no idea. I'm guessing that the Apple version uses some kind of
> > specially-formatted message, since IMAP doesn't have a memo object to my
> > knowledge (I could easily
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 11:06 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > '
> > [imapx:M] camel_imapx_write: 'M00080 UID FETCH 280
> > (BODY.PEEK[]<40960.20480>)
> > '
> > [imapx:M] camel_imapx_write: 'M00079 UID FETCH 280
> > (BODY.PEEK[]<20480.20480>)
> > '
> > [imapx:M] camel_imapx_write: 'M00077 UID FETCH 280
For me since approximately mid June. Error is:
Unexpected response from IMAP server:
Where is pretty much any random header line like From:, Return-Path,
Subject etc.
It simultaneously stopped working on Evolution 3.2.3 Fedora 16 and a previous
version on Fedora 14
Does anyone see this? Thi
: [Evolution] long outstanding evolution bug 339028 - any
updates?
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:56:07 -0400
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 14:33 -0500, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> 12.07.2011, 14:02, "Adam Tauno Williams" :
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:31 -0500, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> >>
12.07.2011, 14:02, "Adam Tauno Williams" :
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:31 -0500, Eugene Kanter wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339028 filed 2006-04-19
>> 13:49:28 UTC and last updated 2011-07-11 08:39:22 UTC, status NEW.
>> Reproduci
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339028 filed 2006-04-19 13:49:28 UTC
and last updated 2011-07-11 08:39:22 UTC, status NEW.
Reproducible in every version including the latest one.
Is there any valid reason for keeping this bug in the code for over 5 years?
As recently as about 3 months
25 matches
Mail list logo
