Re: [Evolution] attachment.dat

2009-11-04 Thread ElectronJockey
But why then, when I reply to the message can I read the original even though I'm composing plain text? Seems like, whatever code handles the reply is parsing the text from the HTML source. Why doesn't/can't the reading pane do this? -Original Message- From: Milan Crha To: evolution-list@

Re: [Evolution] attachment.dat

2009-11-04 Thread ElectronJockey
The attachment name is definitely "attachment.dat". This seems to be the case when Content-Type: text/html. On the other hand, when Content-Type: multipart/alternative there is an attachment (containing the html portion) named "attachment.html", while the text portion is viewable in the reading pa