Dnia 24.06.2022 o godz. 00:35:12 Andre Klapper via evolution-list pisze:
> On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 23:52 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > Why not? I have three accounts defined in Evolution and there is a
> > separate folder tree for each of the accounts.
>
> Because that's IMAP. Not POP.
Ah! I some
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 23:52 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Why not? I have three accounts defined in Evolution and there is a
> separate folder tree for each of the accounts.
Because that's IMAP. Not POP.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
_
Dnia 23.06.2022 o godz. 15:09:05 dr.j.r.walker--- via evolution-list pisze:
>
> It is my understanding that Evolution does not keep separate emails
> from different accounts. It then uses the header information and filter
> rules to distribute the emails to different folders (as desired).
Why not
Hi List,
I have a curious problem, when I check my mail "on this computer" (aka
local mail) which contains things like Cron job reports, apticron
notices, etc. Or more simply put text based email sent by the system. I
have a process called WebKitWebProcess that pegs my CPU. It will use 35
-95% of
>
> It's about differences in design. Claws and Thunderbird have no
> problems with receiving "BCC" emails because they keep separate emails
> downloaded from different accounts. Anything downloaded from a server
> for account X will get put in the inbox for account X irrespective of
> what may be
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 13:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> As others have said, there is no "BCC:" header to filter on. The
> whole
> point of BCC: is that the those recipients are not mentioned anywhere
> in the email headers...
It's about differences in design. Claws and Thunderbird have no
problems
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 07:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> What do I do next so that these remain visible after Evolution
> refreshes the view?
Hi,
I do not know, I'd need to have an account with that provider for
testing.
> I'm not too keen to step out of the Debian repositories bu
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 07:58 -0400, dr.j.r.walker--- via evolution-list
wrote:
> Thanks to all those who have offered suggestions.
>
> I expect that I will be able to filter out some BCC emails based on
> origin.
>
> It's not ideal for me, but, nonetheless, I'm fully aware that I'm using
> "free"
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 07:58 -0400, dr.j.r.walker--- via evolution-list
wrote:
> Thanks to all those who have offered suggestions.
>
> I expect that I will be able to filter out some BCC emails based on
> origin.
>
> It's not ideal for me, but, nonetheless, I'm fully aware that I'm
> using
> "free
Thanks to all those who have offered suggestions.
I expect that I will be able to filter out some BCC emails based on
origin.
It's not ideal for me, but, nonetheless, I'm fully aware that I'm using
"free" software and I'm very grateful to all those that have
contributed to Evolution's development
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 08:20 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 20:39 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > They instructed me to edit the .source file and that appears to be
> > working.
>
> Hi,
> that's nice, both you sorted it out and that they support E
11 matches
Mail list logo