On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 17:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> It reminds me of the other "issue". "The ecological footprint".
>
> Most of the privileged classes care about their "ecological footprint"
> and most of the poor people don't care at all, but actually the
> privileged clas
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I recommend a "psychotherapy".
For the records, I've set the moderation flag on this account. Please
read and follow https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct if you
would like to be active in GNOME community spaces.
Thanks for keepin
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 10:56 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Can we please, PLEASE not get into this here? I've read every single
> argument there is to read, pro and con, about this issue over and over
> on every F/OSS list I subscribe to (and I subscribe to many of them).
Hi,
that's interesting, sin
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 10:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via
> evolution-list wrote:
> > {"name":
> > "bogofilter","buildsystem":
> > "simple","build-commands": ["cd
> > ./bogofilter/ &
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via
> evolution-list wrote:
>
> > My apologies for assuming [...] the Evolution dev team had followed
> > the rest of the software development world in moving away th
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-
list wrote:
> {
> "name": "bogofilter",
> "buildsystem": "simple",
> "build-commands": [
> "cd ./bogofilter/ && echo \"# Skip for Flatpak
> build\" > doc/Makefile.am &&
It reminds me of the other "issue". "The ecological footprint".
Most of the privileged classes care about their "ecological footprint"
and most of the poor people don't care at all, but actually the
privileged classes that care a lot, are those consuming most and who
have the most worse "ecologica
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
wrote:
> My apologies for assuming [...] the Evolution dev team had followed the rest
> of
> the software development world in moving away the master/slave terminology.
I seriously doubt that "the world" moved away from
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:43:30 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>That's your conclusion but we have no idea how you came to that
>conclusion.
It's not that hard to imagine, why somebody has got this guess, if
something doesn't work as expected. Even the German television news
report related to the keywor
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:43 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 08:18 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-
> list wrote:
> > I'm trying to build the lastest version of Evolution available in
> > flatpak.
>
> Which instructions do you follow (URL)?
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 08:18 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-
list wrote:
> I'm trying to build the lastest version of Evolution available in
> flatpak.
Which instructions do you follow (URL)?
> The problem appears to be that Evolution has moved from the
> master/slave notation and flat
I'm trying to build the lastest version of Evolution available in
flatpak.
The problem appears to be that Evolution has moved from the
master/slave notation and flatpak has not
be updated, at least not for Linux Mint.
So what terms did the Evolution team decide to use as replacments for
master/
12 matches
Mail list logo
