On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:38:09 +0100
Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 13:48 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll update the original bug with my findings:
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339675
>
> Hi,
> I'll write it also here, just for a record: the misbehavior can b
Hi Milan,
sorry for this late reply.
I’ve recreated the signature once more and now it’s working.
I had to save the image onto disk and include it by clicking „insert" ->
„Image“ in the editor window.
Loading the image by including a prebuilt html-File with base64 encoding didn’t
work.
The image
I try now this.
Forwarded Message
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:38:35 +0100
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Calendar update
To: evolution
mailto:evolution%20%3cevolution-l...@gnome.org%3e>>
From: Johannes Winterhalter
mailto:johannes%20winterhalter%20%3cjohan...@winterhalter-edv.de%3e
Hi Johannes,
good point. Exact the older version is fine, I'll try the new version.
It's a pitty we see this issues. I try really to promote Linux here around in
local goverment, school, company and like it. But stability is an issue.
Since I use Linux professional and such issues are critical.
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 13:48 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll update the original bug with my findings:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339675
Hi,
I'll write it also here, just for a record: the misbehavior can be
reproduced when the account is set as default. Setting the accoun
Am 06.01.2018 um 21:49 schrieb Hans-Christoph Paul:
*B) private mail on provider mail Exchange 2010*
do not syncronize on all sytems
- windows Exchange in different version - fine
- web Exchange - fine
- iPhone - fine
- SUSE SLED - no
- SUSE SLES - no
I can make an appointment in SLED and it w
On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 20:49 +, Hans-Christoph Paul wrote:
>
> SUSE 12.3, Gnome, Evolution 3.22.6
>
> ...
>
> In general, it does not syncronise towards evolution from Exchange
> 2010.
> The problem came up when changing from SLED / SLES 12.2 to 12.3.
Hi,
I'm sorry, I do not know what
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 10:55 +0100, Bjorn T Johansen wrote:
> Hmm... Ok, so what am I doing wrong here?
Hi,
I do not think you do anything wrong. I tried with the development
version first, where I wasn't able to reproduce it. Then I tried
with 3.26.3 and I can reproduce it there. I'll upda
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:47:15 +0100
Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 10:29 +0100, Bjorn T Johansen wrote:
> > Is this a known bug or am I misunderstanding it's use?
>
> Hi,
> it's not a known bug and it would be a bug, unless the signature is
> already there, in the original mess
On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:47:15 +0100
Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 10:29 +0100, Bjorn T Johansen wrote:
> > Is this a known bug or am I misunderstanding it's use?
>
> Hi,
> it's not a known bug and it would be a bug, unless the signature is
> already there, in the original mess
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 10:29 +0100, Bjorn T Johansen wrote:
> Is this a known bug or am I misunderstanding it's use?
Hi,
it's not a known bug and it would be a bug, unless the signature is
already there, in the original message. I just tried to reproduce it
here, but no luck, the option doe
Hi.
I have checked "Include signature in new messages only" under Composer Pref,
but when I reply to an email, the signature is still included. Is this a
known bug or am I misunderstanding it's use?
This is for an Exchange account using EWS and version 3.26.3 under Arch.
Regards,
BTJ
--
---
12 matches
Mail list logo