On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 11:40 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:02 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I would be disappointed if Evolution were to embrace that
> > particular
> > Outlook feature!
>
> I agree.
>
> > Can you give some form of feedback saying something like
Hi,
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 10:02 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I would be disappointed if Evolution were to embrace that particular
> Outlook feature!
I agree.
> Can you give some form of feedback saying something like "Download
> Paused by Server" and some form of indication how long left t
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 09:58 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 19:25 +, Martin Kelly wrote:
> > 149545
>
> Hi,
> thanks. I'm wondering what evolution-ews should do in such cases.
> Getting this information to UI would not be the best thing, but seeing
> that the server says
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 19:25 +, Martin Kelly wrote:
> 149545
Hi,
thanks. I'm wondering what evolution-ews should do in such cases.
Getting this information to UI would not be the best thing, but seeing
that the server says to wait for almost two and a half minute it would
be pretty conf
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 09:20 -0400, David Burleigh wrote:
> Just looking for a stable configuration that is known to do a clean
> build of Evolution 3.24.
Hi,
just a note that evolution requires evolution-data-server of the same
version (that's one of the issues, because other (also system)
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 14:02 +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
> Anything I can do against it?
Hi,
I can recall only one issue with Exchange 2016 servers, it's
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771370
but that's pretty old and you have that fix in your evolution-ews for
sure.
It would
