Hi All:
This is my system:
jserinki7 jserink # equery list evolution
* Searching for evolution ...
[IP-] [ ] mail-client/evolution-3.22.4:2.0
jserinki7 jserink # equery list evolution-data-server * Searching for
evolution-data-server ...[IP-] [ ]
gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-3.22.4:0
>
> Even you are using Evolution 3.22.5 and you didn't provide the OP any
> help at all,
OK, I can't let this pass.
I didn't say anything in response to the user's question because other
people had said as much as I was able to say; there is no point in me
just saying again what others have sa
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:06:30 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
>Calling distribution release/support cycles "outdated" because you do
>not understand their concept of Long Term Support releases is no help.
You completely ignore the context, I never claimed something like this!
Please, don't spread untru
On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 19:10 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Actually I try to help the OP with 1. the shot in the dark I provided
> and 2. by explaining why Centos is not a good distro for an Evolution
> user.
Calling distribution release/support cycles "outdated" because you do
not understand their
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:10:17 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 16:34 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:53:16 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>> > CentOS 6 is not vintage. It is a current release.
>>
>> You seem not to understand the context of my reply.
You are again
On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 17:10 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Somebody using such a distro, should expect to get weak support by most
> > Linux communities. The best bet is to ask for support at the
> > appropriate place.
> >
>
> CentOS's role in life is to provide an enterprise grade OS to the
> comm
On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 16:34 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:53:16 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > CentOS 6 is not vintage. It is a current release.
>
> You seem not to understand the context of my reply. Evolution 2.32.3 is
> far a way from being a current software release from Ev
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:53:16 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>CentOS 6 is not vintage. It is a current release.
You seem not to understand the context of my reply. Evolution 2.32.3 is
far a way from being a current software release from Evolution
upstream. I never claimed that Centos 6 reached EOL. Feel
> IMO any Evolution version 2.x is even for a long term support distro no
> good choice. It's not related to the issue, but GNOME 2, as well as a
> kernel 2.6.x are much too old, too. GNOME 2 is discontinued since a
> very, very long time and upstream released the last official 2.6 kernel
> in Aug
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 21:13 -0300, Mauricio de Andrade Ramos Mauricio
wrote:
> Hello list, after an update of my Linux Centos 6.8, I started having
> trouble to download/receive my e-mails using evolution client (now in
> version 2.32.3). The first symptoms were just being able to download
> 2 or 3
Hi,
just a shot in the dark, perhaps 2.32.3 changed some options and you
need to change some settings. Maybe the same or similar as described by
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2017-February/msg00147.html .
IMO any Evolution version 2.x is even for a long term support distro no
goo
On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 21:13 -0300, Mauricio de Andrade Ramos Mauricio
wrote:
> Hello list, after an update of my Linux Centos 6.8, I started having
> trouble to download/receive my e-mails using evolution client (now in
> version 2.32.3). The first symptoms were just being able to download 2 or 3
>
Hello list, after an update of my Linux Centos 6.8, I started having
trouble to download/receive my e-mails using evolution client (now in
version 2.32.3). The first symptoms were just being able to download 2 or 3
messages at a time, then the process seems to hang, downloads nothing more
and, at l
The HTML feature set within the default evolution editor is understandably
limited. In addition and like many, I find myself using markdown more and more.
While I'd love to see evolution accept and parse markdown, I understand that is
a large project.
So I was wondering if there may be an easier
14 matches
Mail list logo
