On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 23:22 -0400, Robert Seward wrote:
> Why not a flatpak or snap?
Hi,
simply because I do not want to spend too much time on learning new
"technologies" when there is something available already. I'd rather
spend the time on fixing the bugs. Also note that the evolution
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 14:00 -0400, chern...@astro.cornell.edu wrote:
> My plan, based on the help page
>
> https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/data-storage.html.en
>
> is to copy .local/share/evolution, .config/evolution,
> .config/evolution/sources
> and .config/dconf from the week ol
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 23:22:18 -0400, Robert Seward wrote:
>Why not a flatpak or snap?
Hi,
I'm not one of the developers, just another subscriber.
Have you ever build a snap? Feel free to provide one.
Assuming you should provide one, how do the developers know that bugs
are related to Evolution d
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 11:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to let the users know that we plan to merge the WebKit2 port
> branch of the Evolution and thus make the Evolution depend on the
> WebKit2 (instead of the WebKit1) for the 3.21.90 development release,
> which is planned
The old laptop died of disk failure and I am faced with migrating
evolution to
a new laptop.
I have
(1) a month old evolution-backup-...-tar.gz file,
(2) a week old image of the entire user directory and
(3) most files touhced or created in the last week from
.local/share/evolution
minus a few
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 10:51 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 19:48 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Rudolf perhaps should backup the original file and edit the
> > > file...
>
> Hi,
> that's true. The file will be also overwritten the next time the
> application i
Hello,
I'd like to let the users know that we plan to merge the WebKit2 port
branch of the Evolution and thus make the Evolution depend on the
WebKit2 (instead of the WebKit1) for the 3.21.90 development release,
which is planned to be made the next Monday, August 15th. The 3.22.0
stable re
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 10:57 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 15:05 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >
> > Citations are by default not marked as preformatted, causing them to be
> > formatted really badly with no manual interaction, as you can see with
> > the line having *better* in it
On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 15:05 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Citations are by default not marked as preformatted, causing them to be
> formatted really badly with no manual interaction, as you can see with
> the line having *better* in it.
Hi,
there is an option Edit->Preferences->Composer Pref
On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 19:48 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Rudolf perhaps should backup the original file and edit the file...
Hi,
that's true. The file will be also overwritten the next time the
application is updated (or reinstalled).
Since the 3.22.0, to be released on September 19th,
10 matches
Mail list logo
