On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:21 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:10 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:08 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:27 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > The patch in the attachment is CR/NL
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:10 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:08 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:27 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > The patch in the attachment is CR/NL damaged, even when saved to
> > > file.
> > > I doubt upstream sent it
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:08 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:27 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > The patch in the attachment is CR/NL damaged, even when saved to
> > file.
> > I doubt upstream sent it that way, more likely evo(3.18.2) did that.
>
> How is this related
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 12:27 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> The patch in the attachment is CR/NL damaged, even when saved to
> file.
> I doubt upstream sent it that way, more likely evo(3.18.2) did that.
How is this related to Evolution?
poc
___
evolut
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 13:28 +0100, an unknown sender wrote:
> The patch in the attachment is CR/NL damaged, even when saved to file.
> I doubt upstream sent it that way, more likely evo(3.18.2) did that.
Upstream(Maxim) just confirmed the patch is fine on his end.
>
> Even dos2unix failed to con
The patch in the attachment is CR/NL damaged, even when saved to file.
I doubt upstream sent it that way, more likely evo(3.18.2) did that.
Even dos2unix failed to convert the last line.
Ideas?
Jocke
Forwarded Message
From: Maxim Ostapenko
To: GCC Patches
Cc: joakim.t
