On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 15:03 -0400, Alan Gagne wrote:
> No joy. So I repeated these steps but also removed everything
> under (./.cache/evolution/mail/1378488851.9580.27@dw-agagne/folders.db).
Hi,
could you repeat the cache cleanup again, then run evolution with EWS
debugging on:
$ EWS_
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:02:24 +0100
Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know it's not the "normal" way but it's the way I have always
> > done it... :) I am a developer and I run my IDE on one desktop on
> > display 2 and my web browser on a different desktop on the same display,
> > databaseadmin
Starting having an issue recently were the Summary information does not
match
the message information.
Version: evolution-ews-3.16.3-1.fc22.x86_64
evolution-data-server-3.16.3-2.fc22.x86_64
evolution-3.16.3-2.fc22.x86_64
I am accessing an exchange server using ews.
> Yes, I know it's not the "normal" way but it's the way I have always
> done it... :) I am a developer and I run my IDE on one desktop on
> display 2 and my web browser on a different desktop on the same display,
> databaseadmin app on yet a different desktop, etc...
> At the same time, I have
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 14:22 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> Btw, I like to use launcher to start applications, is there any way
> to start an application from on display and get it to show on the
> other display when using spanning displays?
This is getting way off topic. You should address que
On 16.07.2015 14:05, Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 13:52 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Yes, I know it's not the "normal" way but it's the way I have always
done it... :) I am a developer and I run my IDE on one desktop on
display 2 and my web browser on a different desktop on the same
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 13:52 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> Yes, I know it's not the "normal" way but it's the way I have always
> done it... :) I am a developer and I run my IDE on one desktop on
> display 2 and my web browser on a different desktop on the same
> display, databaseadmin app on y
On 16.07.2015 11:19, Pete Biggs wrote:
Why do you configure your screens in that way and not just span a
single screen across both monitors? It's not a criticism, just
wondering if there is a different way to achieve what you want - having
multiple screens like this is not a "normal" way of doin
> > OK, so you are running a single X server controlling two screens
> > (multiple X servers would be called :0.0, :1.0, etc.). These
> > distinctions are subtle but important.
>
> Aaah, did not know that... I guess that multiple X servers come into
> play with two graphics cards then?
Yes, al
