On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 18:44 +0200, Matthijs van Wolferen wrote:
> Just upgraded to Fedora 22 with 3.16.1 installed.
> Still have this strange problem where I can't write to my CalDAV
> calendar, hosted by Fastmail.
Hi,
does that failed write give you any error message?
> Strange thing is,
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 14:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm seeing both those message in the same thread. In fact the
> > first
> > one is the start of the thread.
>
> This is what I get by using Evolution 3.16.1. The Evolution
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 14:48 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I suggest you report this as a bug in Evo in the usual way.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749203
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list opt
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 14:40 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2015 13:29:14 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >I use a per-list folder for every mailing list I'm on (I also use IMAP
> >but I doubt that makes a difference here). I've no idea how non-RFC
> >threading would work in your co
On Sun, 10 May 2015 13:29:14 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>I use a per-list folder for every mailing list I'm on (I also use IMAP
>but I doubt that makes a difference here). I've no idea how non-RFC
>threading would work in your configuration, where all the header
>information can vary between
PS:
I've forgotten to post a link to my Evolution's preferences.
http://picpaste.com/pics/Screenshot_2015-05-10_14-25-57.1431260873.png
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 14:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm seeing both those message in the same thread. In fact the first
> > one is the start of the thread.
>
> This is what I get by using Evolution 3.16.1. The Evolution mailin
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'm seeing both those message in the same thread. In fact the first
> one is the start of the thread.
This is what I get by using Evolution 3.16.1. The Evolution mailing
list doesn't have it's own folder and I'm using a POP account.
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 13:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:51 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Have you tried "Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->Fall back to
> > threading messages by subject"?
>
> Yes, but this doesn't fix the issue.
>
> With "Fall back to threadin
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:51 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Have you tried "Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->Fall back to
> threading messages by subject"?
Yes, but this doesn't fix the issue.
With "Fall back to threading messages by subject" enabled two mails
are not shown.
From: Justin
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2015 11:24:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> PS: I dislike multipart messages sent to mailing lists. Your mail
> >> isn't a text/HTML multipart, but you include
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> take a look at the thread/s with the subject "GPG Auto download pub
> keys".
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2015-May/thread.html
>
> mentions "".
>
> Claws, the other MUA I'm using, shows this as a single thread.
>
> E
On Sun, 10 May 2015 11:24:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> PS: I dislike multipart messages sent to mailing lists. Your mail
>> isn't a text/HTML multipart, but you include your signature and IMO
>> signing mails sent to mailing lists i
Hi,
take a look at the thread/s with the subject "GPG Auto download pub
keys".
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2015-May/thread.html
mentions "".
Claws, the other MUA I'm using, shows this as a single thread.
Evo does split it into two threads.
Technically Evo does the right thi
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> PS: I dislike multipart messages sent to mailing lists. Your mail
> isn't a text/HTML multipart, but you include your signature and IMO
> signing mails sent to mailing lists is redundant.
Why is it redundant?
poc
__
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 05:59 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 19:11 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 May 2015 17:36:17 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > I totally understand what you are saying.
> >
> > And I absolutely agree with your argument. However, a web of trust
>
16 matches
Mail list logo